Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable

From	<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable
Date	2017-07-06 14:30 +0200
Message-ID	<u0e4X-4gf-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<u02Gt-59t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u04oV-6iD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u04Ii-6v1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0a1k-1IG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0dBT-3QT-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 06:52:13AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> tomas writes:
> > Big, heavily interdependent systems [...]

> I have full Perl and Python environments and I sometimes run CFD, FEM
> and CAD packages.  I think that the key is that I scan debian-dev for
> warnings and don't try to "track" Unstable by upgrading daily.  It's
> best not to upgrade during the first few weeks after a release.

Yes, those two practices go a long way towards keeping you out of
trouble.

> I don't think "just a window manager" quite describes FVWM.

:-)

- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlleLSUACgkQBcgs9XrR2kb/kQCfd7EJWLCfr+qFAt+onx0OIjLK
+YUAnR/QS64aAQQTB6j0MapnfInICfy/
=N1zi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread

Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Jason Cohen <jwittlincohen@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 02:20 +0200
  Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Bob Weber <bobrweber@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 03:40 +0200
  Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 04:10 +0200
    Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 04:30 +0200
      Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:40 +0200
      Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-07-06 10:10 +0200
        Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:40 +0200
        Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 14:00 +0200
          Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-07-06 14:30 +0200
  Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-07-06 06:00 +0200
    Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 13:50 +0200
  Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-07-06 13:50 +0200
    Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 14:10 +0200
      Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-07-06 23:00 +0200
        Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-07-07 19:20 +0200

csiph-web