Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #183275
| From | Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable |
| Date | 2017-07-06 10:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u0aul-1Sl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u02Gt-59t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u04oV-6iD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u04Ii-6v1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0a1k-1IG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
I can not help much in developing or bug analysis, so my contribution has been to test what is handed out to me for testing. I have yet not been able to contribute much as nothing seems to break in testing or sid (amd64 openbox/lxde) ever. Sometimes I wonder when I read the list or archives things being problematic for stable that I have never encountered. Maybe lucky, maybe not trying hard enough. What I have learned testing different distributions is that "stable" and secure are not nearly associated as many people think. My latest favority other distribution has been Manjaro. I currently run linux 4.9/4.11/4.12 in testing there, no problems. Some packages in Manjaro stable are 2-3 years advanced in development than what is maintained in Debian. Very few functionality problems (they can't seem to work along with the grub team). But, is everything going through the same kind of scrutiny with debian or are people exposed to 2-3 years of risk before debian discovers the problem before it introduces a package version in sid? I can not yet tell. So when I am in worry free mode of whatever happens happens, I use Manjaro. For everything else I use testing and sid. 9/10 of debian based distros has been a waste of time and 0 learning value. My ordered favorites within the 1/10 has been kali, siduction, tails (for the shake of keeping an eye of what is changing in that field and getting security ideas) . But they are almost clean debian with some custom extra packages. Switching from Debian to Manjaro is like parking the dodge (slant 6) van for daily use and picking up the sportbike for a careless rural ride. You just can't go to work with a full leather uniform or park it at the metro station. This is my experience with it all. PS There has been a glimpse of an issue of "security for nothing" in Debian as I have been able to place files or edit files at my Debian /home from Manjaro but not the other way around. So I wonder, if manjaro root can read and write in my debian-user's /home where is the security in being unable as debian root to even take a peak at the user's directory? Don't trust your arch/manjaro sys-admin but feel comfortable with Debian sys-admin, unless he is booting a different system? For a single user system Debian makes your life harder, hopefully not for nothing.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Jason Cohen <jwittlincohen@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 02:20 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Bob Weber <bobrweber@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 03:40 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 04:10 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 04:30 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 05:40 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-07-06 10:10 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-07-06 10:40 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 14:00 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-07-06 14:30 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-07-06 06:00 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 13:50 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-07-06 13:50 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-07-06 14:10 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-07-06 23:00 +0200
Re: Relative stability of Testing vs Unstable Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-07-07 19:20 +0200
csiph-web