Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1629998

Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches

From John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches
Date 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200
Message-ID <tzSW6-3hZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tznpf-7qm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzP2b-Rd-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/24/2017 06:19 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> In proposed implementation, we also use hint address, but in different
> way: by default, if hint address is NULL, kernel would not create mappings
> above 47-bits, preserving compatibility.

Ooooh, that would solve a lot of problems actually if it were to be available
on all architectures. On SPARC, the situation is really annoying and I have
been discussing a solution with the Qt developers and they suggested a
similar approach, just one that would also apply to brk() [1].

> If an application wants to have access to larger address space, it has to
> specify hint addess above 47-bits.
> 
> See details here:
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170420162147.86517-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com

Thanks. I'll have a read. Although from your message I'm reading out that
this particular proposal got rejected.

Would be really nice to able to have a canonical solution for this issue,
it's been biting us on SPARC for quite a while now due to the fact that
virtual address space has been 52 bits on SPARC for a while now.

Adrian

> [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56264

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Question on the five-level page table support patches John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-04-23 13:00 +0200
  Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-24 07:20 +0200
    Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-24 15:10 +0200
      Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200
  Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-04-24 18:30 +0200
    Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200
      Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-04-25 00:10 +0200
      Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-25 00:20 +0200
        Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> - 2017-04-25 09:30 +0200

csiph-web