Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1629998
| From | John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches |
| Date | 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tzSW6-3hZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tznpf-7qm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzP2b-Rd-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 04/24/2017 06:19 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > In proposed implementation, we also use hint address, but in different > way: by default, if hint address is NULL, kernel would not create mappings > above 47-bits, preserving compatibility. Ooooh, that would solve a lot of problems actually if it were to be available on all architectures. On SPARC, the situation is really annoying and I have been discussing a solution with the Qt developers and they suggested a similar approach, just one that would also apply to brk() [1]. > If an application wants to have access to larger address space, it has to > specify hint addess above 47-bits. > > See details here: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170420162147.86517-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Thanks. I'll have a read. Although from your message I'm reading out that this particular proposal got rejected. Would be really nice to able to have a canonical solution for this issue, it's been biting us on SPARC for quite a while now due to the fact that virtual address space has been 52 bits on SPARC for a while now. Adrian > [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56264 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question on the five-level page table support patches John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-04-23 13:00 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-24 07:20 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-24 15:10 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-04-24 18:30 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-04-25 00:10 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-25 00:20 +0200
Re: Question on the five-level page table support patches Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> - 2017-04-25 09:30 +0200
csiph-web