Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary?

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: sci.physics behavior \| Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary?
Date	2016-04-07 20:19 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<turitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<fJidncHgRurSM5jKnZ2dnUU7-YOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <be08ee8f-e136-4d58-b376-345fb59d80e4@googlegroups.com> <S8mdnagfo9G7xJvKnZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/7/16 1:19 AM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
>> I clearly recall you accusing Jim Pennino of being "blue collar"
>> because he used language you consider vulgar. But to quote from the
>> article you cited.
> 
> 
>   His behavior at the time was similar to "blue collar" workers that I
>   encounter.  Nuff said.

Go fuck yourself, copyright violatng, spamming ass hat.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 19:48 -0500
  Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-06 20:37 -0500
    Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 00:17 -0400
  Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 04:33 +0000
    Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 02:28 -0400
      Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-07 06:49 -0500
  Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 23:19 -0700
    Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 02:34 -0400
    Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 05:18 -0700
    Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 07:57 -0500
      Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:19 +0000
      Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 22:28 -0700
  sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 -0700
    Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 02:45 -0400
      Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-07 06:52 -0500
        Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 05:08 -0700
          Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 05:16 -0700
            Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 05:28 -0700
            Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 10:30 -0400
          Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 10:15 -0400
        Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-07 13:50 -0700
  Re: sci.physics behavior | Is Swearing a Sign of a Limited Vocabulary? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-09 22:57 -0700

csiph-web