Re: Scientific American-Then and Now

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Scientific American-Then and Now
Date	2016-04-07 20:17 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<2rritc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<S8mdnaYfo9H8wpvKnZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com> <ne5rr8$174g$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 4/7/2016 8:23 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> Scientific American-Then and Now
>>> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/first-issue-thoughts/
>>
>>
>>> Thoughts on the first issue of Scientific American, from 1845, now
>>> available online.
>>
>>> Nature Publishing Group (which publishes Scientific American)
>>> announced today that it has now digitized all of Scientific
>>> American?s archive, going back to Volume 1, Issue 1 from 1845.
>>
>>> I decided to take a look at the first issue, which was targeted to
>>> Americans of a mechanical bent, and started to reflect on how much
>>> (or how little) has changed in the intervening 166 years:
>>
>>
>>    The "quality" of "Scientific American" appears often is posting
>>    to sci.physics.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> old artical => By Christine Gorman on November 1, 2011
> 
> 
> poor scientific american, infested with liberal contract journalists 
> with little science background writing politically correct articals.
> 
> It was far better before 2000

It was far better before 1970.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scientific American-Then and Now Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:23 -0500
  Re: Scientific American-Then and Now Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:35 -0500
    Re: Scientific American-Then and Now benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 10:27 -0400
    Re: Scientific American-Then and Now Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-07 21:30 -0500
      Re: Scientific American-Then and Now benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 00:03 -0400
  Re: Scientific American-Then and Now Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-07 09:45 -0500
    Re: Scientific American-Then and Now Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-07 12:32 -0700
    Re: Scientific American-Then and Now jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:17 +0000

csiph-web