Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #179573
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Wan/Lan problem |
| Date | 2017-03-29 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tqlmG-6Yd-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tqarg-7UU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqg3E-3we-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 03:17:37 AM David Christensen wrote: > On 03/28/2017 04:46 PM, Mike McClain wrote: > > Howdy, > > I have a WAN/LAN challenge I'm hoping for help with. > > > > I'm runniing Debian 7.11 on a Pentium 3 with 250MB ram. > > > > mike@/deb7:~> uname -a > > Linux playground 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.84-2 i686 GNU/Linux > > > > The situation is this: > > phone eth0 eth1 > > > > AT&T-------| |--------| |--------| |-------| | > > > > AT&T modem/ Linux my Win2K > > > > router box router box I apologize because this doesn't answer your question but proposes an alternative arrangment that, I believe, would be easier to configure. I don't know the physical arrangement of your devices (in your home or office), but my arrangement (and most arrangements I've seen) are a little different and maybe you want to try an arrangment more like this: Put your router immediately after the AT&T modem, then (assuming there are multiple ethernet ports on the router), put your Linux box on one eth port and the Windows box on another. (That would require 3 ports on the router.) If you don't have 3 ports on the router, consider getting a switch to place after the router, and put the Linux and Windows boxes on 2 separate outputs from the switch. Either of these is a much more standard arrangement, and I have very little trouble with any of this. (The troubles I have had are not relevant to the arrangement--things like Earthlink / Verizon outages and dealing with their customer non-support, an anomaly in how a Westell modem worked (now using a ZyXel), and difficulties in understanding and configuring QOS (primarily for VOIP).)
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wan/Lan problem Mike McClain <mike.junk.46@copper.net> - 2017-03-29 03:20 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-03-29 04:20 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Mike McClain <mike.junk.46@copper.net> - 2017-03-29 18:10 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Joshua Schaeffer <jschaeffer0922@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 20:50 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-03-29 21:20 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-29 21:50 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-03-29 09:20 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 15:00 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Mike McClain <mike.junk.46@copper.net> - 2017-03-29 23:30 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem rhkramer@gmail.com - 2017-03-30 15:50 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-29 11:50 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem kAt <giathnygeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-29 23:10 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-03-30 13:30 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Mike McClain <mike.junk.46@copper.net> - 2017-03-31 02:50 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-03-31 03:50 +0200
Re: Wan/Lan problem [SOLVED] Mike McClain <mike.junk.46@copper.net> - 2017-03-31 23:10 +0200
csiph-web