Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1610284

linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security tree

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Jiri,

Today's linux-next merge of the livepatching tree got conflicts in:

  include/linux/init_task.h
  include/linux/sched.h

between commit:

  e4e55b47ed9a ("LSM: Revive security_task_alloc() hook and per "struct task_struct" security blob.")

from the security tree and commit:

  d83a7cb375ee ("livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model")

from the livepatching tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/init_task.h
index 926f2f553cc5,5a791055b176..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@@ -294,7 -296,7 +302,8 @@@ extern struct cred init_cred
  	INIT_VTIME(tsk)							\
  	INIT_NUMA_BALANCING(tsk)					\
  	INIT_KASAN(tsk)							\
 +	INIT_TASK_SECURITY						\
+ 	INIT_LIVEPATCH(tsk)						\
  }
  
  
diff --cc include/linux/sched.h
index 9ac23308c82c,e11032010318..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@@ -1042,10 -1038,9 +1042,13 @@@ struct task_struct 
  	/* A live task holds one reference: */
  	atomic_t			stack_refcount;
  #endif
 +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
 +	/* Used by LSM modules for access restriction: */
 +	void				*security;
 +#endif
+ #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
+ 	int patch_state;
+ #endif
  	/* CPU-specific state of this task: */
  	struct thread_struct		thread;
  

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security  tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security tree Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-03-28 13:30 +0200

csiph-web