Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1610284 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-28 06:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-03-28 13:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security tree Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-03-28 13:30 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 06:20 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security tree |
| Message-ID | <tpQLT-27u-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Jiri,
Today's linux-next merge of the livepatching tree got conflicts in:
include/linux/init_task.h
include/linux/sched.h
between commit:
e4e55b47ed9a ("LSM: Revive security_task_alloc() hook and per "struct task_struct" security blob.")
from the security tree and commit:
d83a7cb375ee ("livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model")
from the livepatching tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc include/linux/init_task.h
index 926f2f553cc5,5a791055b176..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@@ -294,7 -296,7 +302,8 @@@ extern struct cred init_cred
INIT_VTIME(tsk) \
INIT_NUMA_BALANCING(tsk) \
INIT_KASAN(tsk) \
+ INIT_TASK_SECURITY \
+ INIT_LIVEPATCH(tsk) \
}
diff --cc include/linux/sched.h
index 9ac23308c82c,e11032010318..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@@ -1042,10 -1038,9 +1042,13 @@@ struct task_struct
/* A live task holds one reference: */
atomic_t stack_refcount;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+ /* Used by LSM modules for access restriction: */
+ void *security;
+#endif
+ #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
+ int patch_state;
+ #endif
/* CPU-specific state of this task: */
struct thread_struct thread;
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 13:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the security tree |
| Message-ID | <tpXu2-6Nb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1610284 |
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the livepatching tree got conflicts in:
>
> include/linux/init_task.h
> include/linux/sched.h
>
> between commit:
>
> e4e55b47ed9a ("LSM: Revive security_task_alloc() hook and per "struct task_struct" security blob.")
>
> from the security tree and commit:
>
> d83a7cb375ee ("livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model")
>
> from the livepatching tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thank you for fixing.
This is an append to "struct task_struct" race which is inevitable.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc include/linux/init_task.h
> index 926f2f553cc5,5a791055b176..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/init_task.h
> +++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
> @@@ -294,7 -296,7 +302,8 @@@ extern struct cred init_cred
> INIT_VTIME(tsk) \
> INIT_NUMA_BALANCING(tsk) \
> INIT_KASAN(tsk) \
> + INIT_TASK_SECURITY \
> + INIT_LIVEPATCH(tsk) \
> }
>
>
> diff --cc include/linux/sched.h
> index 9ac23308c82c,e11032010318..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@@ -1042,10 -1038,9 +1042,13 @@@ struct task_struct
> /* A live task holds one reference: */
> atomic_t stack_refcount;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> + /* Used by LSM modules for access restriction: */
> + void *security;
> +#endif
> + #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
Just a comment to livepatch change. It seems that addition of
/* A comment line for this variable: */
line and indentation alignment is expected due to
"Unscheduled maintenance for sched.h" work.
> + int patch_state;
> + #endif
> /* CPU-specific state of this task: */
> struct thread_struct thread;
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web