Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178649
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: why??why?why?? |
| Date | 2017-03-10 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tjv7s-66F-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tjijT-5pm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjijT-5pm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tju1I-5nB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/10/2017 08:20 AM, Henning wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> why o why..
> [some wining]
>
> Why don't you just custom install to meet your needs?
>
How about a more useful reply.
Is is the OP aware of the depth and breadth of resources such as:
Debian Pure Blends [https://www.debian.org/blends/]
Debian Derivatives [https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives
https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census]
Has the OP been encouraged to use "Expert mode" when doing an install?
I personally see titling that option as "Expert" may be off-putting to
some. It gives insight into how the installer is organized and you are
given default options for all questions that would not be asked during a
typical install.
Another option is to install only the CLI. And then use
"apt-get install ..." to only desired packages.
Exploration of meta-packages (use metapackage as search term) will be
informative. As I consider Gnome3 to be terminally {pun intended} ugly I
base my installs on MATE.
E.G. explore https://packages.debian.org/jessie/task-mate-desktop and
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/task-desktop to get much
customization can be accomplished by appropriate choices.
The OP's observations are a natural result of the Debian Team's efforts
to provide everything that most users would expect. The problem words
there are "everything", "most" and "expect". Part of Debian's strength
is, to borrow somebody's advertising slogan, "Have it your way".
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why??why?why?? Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-10 03:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2017-03-10 10:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-10 10:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-03-10 15:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-10 17:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 21:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Jimmy Johnson <jimmyjhn@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 02:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-11 03:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Jimmy Johnson <jimmyjhn@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 04:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 14:30 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 18:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 03:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 21:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-11 03:30 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 14:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 10:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 12:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 12:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 14:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 15:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 17:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-03-12 17:20 +0100
[OT]Re: why??why?why?? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-03-12 19:20 +0100
Re: [OT]Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-12 23:00 +0100
Re: [OT]Re: why??why?why?? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-03-13 11:00 +0100
Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-13 16:00 +0100
Re: Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2017-03-13 20:30 +0100
Re: Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@mac.com> - 2017-03-13 22:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen (was: Apology to siduction...) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-13 23:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen (was: Apology to siduction...) Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 00:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 00:40 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 02:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 03:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-14 05:50 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 06:20 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 06:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-14 05:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2017-03-31 13:00 +0200
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:00 +0200
csiph-web