Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178812
| From | David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: why??why?why?? |
| Date | 2017-03-14 05:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tkM6d-340-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tjijT-5pm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjijT-5pm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tk7w5-7rz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun 12 Mar 2017 at 17:57:19 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:09:22AM +0000, Shahryar Afifi wrote: > > > > why o why... > > why debian keeps getting fancier like other operating system. > > debian is a linux machine, not some toy like apple. > > we dont need gnome 3 taking too much ram, in fact we dont need any graphical runtime. > > they dont wanna support the poor wheezy for what ??? and why ?? > > its the most stable OS ever.. thats why they called it old stable. > > why cant i add libpam-fprindt 1:0.5 to my wheezy so i can run my fingerprint ?? > > why nautilus in jessie is so fancy ?? > > when i work on my wheezy, everything is just right even when they say "its init and PID runs one by one" so what.. its a computer and should look like and act like a computer. > > i dont wanna give up my reliability to some fancy mancy.. > > :( > > > > SH.A > > > > This is yet another of those threads where the OP never returns after > dropping their troll bomb... the only why oh why here is why oh why do > we collectively never learn not to feed the trolls... The OP is the guy still trying to get a fingerprint reader working. Three posts so far. Perhaps, like me, they were perfectly happy with running wheezy but, unlike me, they have a piece of new hardware that requires a more modern kernel or whatever. Cheers, David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why??why?why?? Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-10 03:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2017-03-10 10:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-10 10:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-03-10 15:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-10 17:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 21:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Jimmy Johnson <jimmyjhn@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 02:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-11 03:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Jimmy Johnson <jimmyjhn@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 04:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 14:30 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 18:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 03:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 21:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-11 03:30 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 14:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 10:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 12:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 12:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 14:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 15:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 17:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-03-12 17:20 +0100
[OT]Re: why??why?why?? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-03-12 19:20 +0100
Re: [OT]Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-12 23:00 +0100
Re: [OT]Re: why??why?why?? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-03-13 11:00 +0100
Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-13 16:00 +0100
Re: Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2017-03-13 20:30 +0100
Re: Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@mac.com> - 2017-03-13 22:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen (was: Apology to siduction...) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-13 23:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen (was: Apology to siduction...) Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 00:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 00:40 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 02:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 03:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-14 05:50 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 06:20 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 06:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-14 05:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2017-03-31 13:00 +0200
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:00 +0200
csiph-web