Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178634
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: why??why?why?? |
| Date | 2017-03-10 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tjofE-1eN-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tjijT-5pm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjijT-5pm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:09:22AM +0000, Shahryar Afifi wrote: > > why o why... > why debian keeps getting fancier like other operating system. > debian is a linux machine, not some toy like apple. It's called progress. Not that I like it personally. > we dont need gnome 3 taking too much ram, in fact we dont need any graphical runtime. Do not install it then. GNOME3 is not the only 'graphical runtime' they give you in Debian. > they dont wanna support the poor wheezy for what ??? and why ?? > its the most stable OS ever.. thats why they called it old stable. If you like it so much - you're free to support it yourself. Besides, 'the most stable OS ever' was sarge, not wheezy, if we count Debian releases only. > why cant i add libpam-fprindt 1:0.5 to my wheezy so i can run my fingerprint ?? You can. Build it from the source and install it. > why nautilus in jessie is so fancy ?? Do not use it if you don't like it. Do not install it if you can't stand it. Nautilus is not the only file manager in Debian. > when i work on my wheezy, everything is just right even when they say "its init and PID runs one by one" so what.. So what indeed? Either it works and does not trouble you, or it does not, and you file a bug report. > its a computer and should look like and act like a computer. > i dont wanna give up my reliability to some fancy mancy.. Elaboration needed. In what ways you give up your own reliability by using, say jessie? Reco
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why??why?why?? Shahryar Afifi <shahryarafifi@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-10 03:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2017-03-10 10:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-10 10:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2017-03-10 15:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-10 17:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 21:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Jimmy Johnson <jimmyjhn@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 02:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-11 03:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Jimmy Johnson <jimmyjhn@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 04:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 14:30 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 18:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 03:10 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 21:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-11 03:30 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 14:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Mark Fletcher <mark27q1@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 10:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 12:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 12:50 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 14:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 15:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 17:00 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-03-12 17:20 +0100
[OT]Re: why??why?why?? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-03-12 19:20 +0100
Re: [OT]Re: why??why?why?? GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-12 23:00 +0100
Re: [OT]Re: why??why?why?? Michael Lange <klappnase@freenet.de> - 2017-03-13 11:00 +0100
Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-13 16:00 +0100
Re: Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) Rob van der Putten <rob@sput.nl> - 2017-03-13 20:30 +0100
Re: Apology to siduction 17.01 (was Re: why??why?why??) Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@mac.com> - 2017-03-13 22:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen (was: Apology to siduction...) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-13 23:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen (was: Apology to siduction...) Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 00:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 00:40 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Catherine Gramze <rhiamom@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 02:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 03:00 +0100
Re: radeon black screen David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-14 05:50 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 06:20 +0100
Re: radeon black screen Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-14 06:40 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-03-14 05:20 +0100
Re: why??why?why?? cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2017-03-31 13:00 +0200
Re: why??why?why?? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:00 +0200
csiph-web