Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1598285
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata |
| Date | 2017-03-11 08:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tjJWN-83e-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tjgi6-45M-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjqr8-2Qu-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjxsC-7NS-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjxVD-80K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tjATw-1Jy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Luck, Tony wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:58:51PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Well, we have several options to tackle this: > > > > 1) Have schemata files for each resource > > > > schemata_l2, _l3 _mb > > > > 2) Request a full overwrite every time (all entries required) > > > > That still does not require ordering > > > > 3) Allow full overwrite and 'append' mode > > > > echo "...." > schemata > > > > Overwrites the whole file. It does not require all entries to be > > supplied. Non supplied entries are reset to default > > > > echo "...." >> schemata > > > > "Appends" the supplied entries by overwriting the existing ones. > > > > My favourite would be #1, but I have no strong opinions other than not > > caring about resource write ordering for #2 and #3. > > If you are going to head in the direction of partial update, then > why not go for: > > 4) Drop the code that check that the user wrote all > the fields as well as the check for all the lines. Just update > the bits they list, and leave the rest unchanged. > > I.e. the user could say: > > # echo "L3:1=0x3f" > schemata > > if they just wanted to update resource L3, instance 1. Even better > I don't think there is much benefit to the overwrite vs. append > semantics for the user. Agreed. Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-01 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-10 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-10 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-03-10 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-10 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2017-03-10 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-11 08:50 +0100
csiph-web