Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178376
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? |
| Date | 2017-03-03 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <th1dw-5N1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tgDux-67m-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgUOK-1js-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgZY5-50J-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | This space intentionally left blank. |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2017-03-03 at 13:00, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:25:13 -0500 > The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >> systemd as the init system is provided by the systemd-sysv package. I >> have that package pinned to never install in /etc/preferences: >> >> Package: systemd-sysv >> Pin: version * >> Pin-Priority: -1 >> >> but this doesn't seem to be entirely effective in some cases, for >> reasons I've given up on trying to track down; still, it may be making a >> difference. I want to correct the record on this. When I wrote the above, I was conflating multiple cases. What I have seen be ineffective is previous pins, no longer present, against libpam-systemd and related packages; I don't recall ever seeing anything try to install systemd-sysv in violation of this pin. (There are enough legitimate complaints against the systemd ecosystem; there's no need to hurt the case against such things by throwing in baseless complaints on top of them.) > You may want to try somewhat different approach then: > > Package: systemd-sysv > Pin: release a=stable > Pin-Priority: -1 I've noted this for later reference; if I ever see the trying-to-install-packages-pinned-at--1 behavior again, I'll try that variant. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 19:20 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-02 22:10 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 18:30 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 13:50 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 19:10 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-03-06 11:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 19:20 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Aquarius <aquarius@tutanota.de> - 2017-03-03 22:50 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? AntiX GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-04 13:00 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? AntiX Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? AntiX songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-03-04 21:00 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 16:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 22:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 05:10 +0100
csiph-web