Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178363
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? |
| Date | 2017-03-03 13:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgUOK-1js-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tgDux-67m-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | This space intentionally left blank. |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2017-03-02 at 13:01, Patrick Bartek wrote: > I've been considering Stretch as a clean install or dist-upgrade of > my aging Wheezy desktop setup as well as to install on a new notebook > I've yet to decide on. I don't like systemd (why is unimportant to > this query). I plan to use some other init system, probably runit. > So ... > > Just how dependent has Stretch's system become on systemd? I don't > mean applications or GNOME, etc. with systemd dependency that I can > choose not to install, but the system itself, the guts, the basics, > the things and tools it needs to work properly. There are two packages which are in some sense "part of" systemd which you will not be able to avoid: libsystemd0 and udev. libsystemd0 is the "detect at runtime whether systemd is present" library; it's what makes it possible for programs to use systemd when it's there, but still work when it isn't. It might _technically_ be possible to avoid this, but one of the packages which depends on this is xserver-xorg-core, so for most systemd that will not be a practical option. udev wasn't originally a systemd thing, but is now maintained by the systemd people, and apparently shipped from the same source package (or at least I can't see any other reason why changes to udev would appear in apt-listchanges under the name of "systemd"). Those are the only systemd-related packages on my current primary machine (unless you count systemd-shim, which exists specifically to make avoiding systemd itself possible), and I've been running it with no apparent related issues for pretty much the entire time since the systemd transition. I do have to keep an eye on 'apt-get dist-upgrade' and on normal package installs to make sure that nothing pulls in libpam-systemd and then systemd automatically - but it's been quite a while since anything tried to do that, and even that would only get systemd as a "normal" daemon rather than as the init system. systemd as the init system is provided by the systemd-sysv package. I have that package pinned to never install in /etc/preferences: Package: systemd-sysv Pin: version * Pin-Priority: -1 but this doesn't seem to be entirely effective in some cases, for reasons I've given up on trying to track down; still, it may be making a difference. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 19:20 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-02 22:10 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 18:30 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 13:50 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 19:10 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-03-06 11:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 19:20 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-03-03 20:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Aquarius <aquarius@tutanota.de> - 2017-03-03 22:50 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? AntiX GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-04 13:00 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? AntiX Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 17:00 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? AntiX songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-03-04 21:00 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 16:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 22:40 +0100
Re: Stretch & Safely Replacing systemd? Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 05:10 +0100
csiph-web