Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #178328

Re: A minimal relational database in Debian

From Joe <joe@jretrading.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: A minimal relational database in Debian
Date 2017-03-01 17:40 +0100
Message-ID <tgfse-5E0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <tgbHY-334-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgbHY-334-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgcNI-3LX-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tge38-4N8-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgeFQ-55d-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization JRE Trading Ltd

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:41:14 -0600
Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote:

>
> 
> That triggers another question to be investigated.
> I'm using  LO 4.3.3.2 on Jessie(8.6.0)/MATE .
> I do not have the bandwidth to do a Netinstall.
> Would any bug I file get anything but "won't fix" since I'm so out of
> date?
> 
> 
Possibly, the issue would be whether it can be demonstrated on a recent
version, at least 5. I've never had this problem, and I've used Base
for some years, certainly during version 4, and possibly earlier.

It's probably worth submitting it, at worst it costs a few minutes. It
may be a matter of an unfortunate combination of graphics support
libraries that is still a problem with version 5 and that hasn't yet
been seen by anyone else. It's surprising how long a moderately serious
breakage of GTK can take to fix if it doesn't affect everyone. I've had
some long-term issues with it over the last few years, but of course,
this is sid. I believe it was a GTK problem that left Synaptic unusable
for weeks last year.

Base is improving fast, as I suppose it got left behind the rest of LO.
It is certainly more useful now than it was with version 4,
particularly in terms of database compatibility. It works natively with
MySQL now, I have a feeling version 4 mostly needed ODBC to talk to
anything. I hadn't realised you were that far behind with Jessie.

-- 
Joe

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A minimal relational database in Debian? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-27 14:20 +0100
  Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-02-27 14:30 +0100
    Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-02-27 15:20 +0100
    Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-02-27 15:50 +0100
    Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 03:40 +0100
  Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? James Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com> - 2017-02-27 14:50 +0100
  Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-02-27 14:50 +0100
    A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-27 16:00 +0100
      Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in  Debian?] Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-02-27 16:50 +0100
        Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-27 17:50 +0100
          Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in  Debian?] sunrise <sunrise@emypeople.net> - 2017-02-27 21:20 +0100
            Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-27 21:50 +0100
            Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 03:40 +0100
          Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-02-27 21:50 +0100
            Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-28 03:50 +0100
              Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] conover@rahul.net (John Conover) - 2017-02-28 04:40 +0100
  Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-02-27 19:10 +0100
  an answer plus minimal font size (was: A minimal relational  database in Debian? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-02-27 20:50 +0100
  Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-02-28 01:10 +0100
    Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-28 04:00 +0100
  Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 03:40 +0100
    Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Dominic Knight <dominicknight@gmx.com> - 2017-03-01 00:30 +0100
      Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 00:50 +0100
        Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-03-01 09:10 +0100
          Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-01 10:50 +0100
          font sizes in LibreOffice (was Re: A minimal relational database in  Debian) Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-03-01 12:20 +0100
          Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 13:40 +0100
            Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 14:50 +0100
              Contributing [was: A minimal relational database in Debian] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 15:00 +0100
              Re: A minimal relational database in Debian John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-03-01 15:10 +0100
              Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2017-03-01 15:20 +0100
              Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-03-01 15:50 +0100
              Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-01 16:10 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 16:50 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-01 17:40 +0100
          Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 13:40 +0100
            Re: bad LibreOffice font sizes (was: A minimal relational data...) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-01 14:10 +0100
            Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Bob Weber <bobrweber@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 15:20 +0100
              Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 16:00 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 21:40 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-03 09:50 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-03 10:50 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-03-03 19:00 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-03 22:00 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-03 11:20 +0100
                Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-03 12:50 +0100
        Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 10:40 +0100
        Re: A minimal relational database in Debian GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-01 10:40 +0100

csiph-web