Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #178231
| From | sunrise <sunrise@emypeople.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] |
| Date | 2017-02-27 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfzW1-2es-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tftnA-65z-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <tftQC-6g8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfuWl-6ZE-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfvIJ-7An-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfwEN-8dT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:46:16 -0600 Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote: >On 02/27/2017 09:44 AM, Joe wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:53:30 -0600 >> Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote: >> >>> On 02/27/2017 07:43 AM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> LibreOffice Base is, AFAIK *not* a relational database, but just >>>> a -possibly graphical- user interface to one. Relational databases, >>>> as I know them, have no "fonts", for example. >>> >>> I didn't claim it was ;/ >>> I looked at it as it was install by default when I chose MATE as my >>> DE. The "font problem" was that I could not force its "help system" >>> to use a legible font size. Not being able to read its "help", I have >>> ABSOLUTELY NO idea of what capability it does/doesn't supply. >>> >> >> It's sort of functionally nearly equivalent to MS Access on Windows 3 >> i.e. 1992-ish. > >I had forgotten about MS Access, probably 'cause the less I think about >that employer the better. It was later than dBaseII but aimed pretty >much at the same market. Having used dBaseII was considered "qualifying >experience" for the job. > >> It's slow and as buggy as hell. It can't handle update >> queries. I think it still needs Java for reporting. Apart from that, >> it's about the quickest way to assemble an ad-hoc database >> application. >> Free, that is, there are probably better commercial products. I use it >> for this reason, but also that it is cross-platform, you can literally >> take a Base file from a Linux machine and run it on a Windows machine, >> and vice versa (for close-numbered versions of LO). >> >> But a lot depends on what you want to do. Only you know your actual >> database needs. LO Base can use an internal database file or pretty >> much any client-server database or other ODBC server. For making user >> applications, it's worth considering. > >Not if it throws barriers between me ant its documentation. In LibreOffice Help, try scrolling with the mouse wheel while holding 'Ctrl'; on my system the font size can be increased and decreased across a wide range.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A minimal relational database in Debian? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-27 14:20 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-02-27 14:30 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-02-27 15:20 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-02-27 15:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 03:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? James Allsopp <jamesaallsopp@googlemail.com> - 2017-02-27 14:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-02-27 14:50 +0100
A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-27 16:00 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-02-27 16:50 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-27 17:50 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] sunrise <sunrise@emypeople.net> - 2017-02-27 21:20 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-02-27 21:50 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 03:40 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-02-27 21:50 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-28 03:50 +0100
Re: A cumulative reply [Re: A minimal relational database in Debian?] conover@rahul.net (John Conover) - 2017-02-28 04:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-02-27 19:10 +0100
an answer plus minimal font size (was: A minimal relational database in Debian? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-02-27 20:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-02-28 01:10 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-02-28 04:00 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 03:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Dominic Knight <dominicknight@gmx.com> - 2017-03-01 00:30 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 00:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-03-01 09:10 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-01 10:50 +0100
font sizes in LibreOffice (was Re: A minimal relational database in Debian) Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-03-01 12:20 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 13:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 14:50 +0100
Contributing [was: A minimal relational database in Debian] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 15:00 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-03-01 15:10 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2017-03-01 15:20 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2017-03-01 15:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-01 16:10 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 16:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-03-01 17:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 13:40 +0100
Re: bad LibreOffice font sizes (was: A minimal relational data...) Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-03-01 14:10 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Bob Weber <bobrweber@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 15:20 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-01 16:00 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 21:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-03 09:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-03 10:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-03-03 19:00 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-03-03 22:00 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-03 11:20 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-03-03 12:50 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-03-01 10:40 +0100
Re: A minimal relational database in Debian GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> - 2017-03-01 10:40 +0100
csiph-web