Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1589887
| From | Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock |
| Date | 2017-03-01 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tg009-3dN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tfIFX-8oQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfYUq-2fP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>> + if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + goto fail;
>
> Pulling this out of the queue_lock doesn't seem safe to me. This
> function may end up calling into callbacks of disabled policies this
> way.
I will move this to within the lock. To make things safe, I am also
thinking of rechecking both blkcg_policy_enabled() and
blk_queue_bypass() after reacquiring the locks in each iteration.
>> + parent = blkcg_parent(blkcg);
>> + while (parent && !__blkg_lookup(parent, q, false)) {
>> + pos = parent;
>> + parent = blkcg_parent(parent);
>> + }
>
> Hmm... how about adding @new_blkg to blkg_lookup_create() and calling
> it with non-NULL @new_blkg until it succeeds? Wouldn't that be
> simpler?
>
>> +
>> + new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, q, GFP_KERNEL);
The challenge with that approach is creating a new_blkg with the right
blkcg before passing to blkg_lookup_create(). blkg_lookup_create()
walks down the hierarchy and will try to fill the first missing entry
and the preallocated new_blkg must have been created with the right
blkcg (feel free to send a code fragment if you think I am
misunderstanding the suggestion).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-02-28 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-01 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-01 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-01 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-02 01:20 +0100
[PATCH v2] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-02 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-02 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-02 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-03 20:30 +0100
[PATCH v3] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-04 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-04 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-05 15:30 +0100
[PATCH v4] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-05 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-06 21:10 +0100
[PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-09 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-03-09 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-11 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-12 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-12 05:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-13 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-13 17:20 +0100
Re: [lkp-robot] [blkcg] ad63af3cb7: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> - 2017-03-09 09:10 +0100
csiph-web