Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1579978
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator |
| Date | 2017-02-13 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tatod-7ga-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <taq70-4Xt-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > An other question is: do we have others memory regions that could be interested > by this new framework ? I have in mind that some title memory regions could use > it or replace ION heaps (system, carveout, etc...). > Maybe it only solve CMA allocation issue, in this case there is no need to create > a new framework but only a dedicated ioctl. The software defined networking people seemed to think they had a use case for this as well. They're not entirely upstream of course but still...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> - 2017-02-13 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-13 19:20 +0100
Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 17:50 +0100
csiph-web