Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1579978

Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator
Date 2017-02-13 19:20 +0100
Message-ID <tatod-7ga-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <taq70-4Xt-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:

> An other question is: do we have others memory regions that could be interested
> by this new framework ? I have in mind that some title memory regions could use
> it or replace ION heaps (system, carveout, etc...).
> Maybe it only solve CMA allocation issue, in this case there is no need to create
> a new framework but only a dedicated ioctl.

The software defined networking people seemed to think they had a use
case for this as well.  They're not entirely upstream of course but
still...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> - 2017-02-13 15:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-13 19:20 +0100
    Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC simple allocator v2 0/2] Simple allocator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 17:50 +0100

csiph-web