Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1656392
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH RT] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup |
| Date | 2017-06-02 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNXVT-3GU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Mathias and some others reported GDB failures on RT.
The following scenario leads to task state corruption:
CPU0 CPU1
T1->state = TASK_XXX;
spin_lock(&lock)
rt_spin_lock_slowlock(&lock->rtmutex)
raw_spin_lock(&rtm->wait_lock);
T1->saved_state = current->state;
T1->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
spin_unlock(&lock)
task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(rtm) rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(&lock->rtmutex)
queue_waiter(rtm) raw_spin_lock(&rtm->wait_lock);
pi_chain_walk(rtm)
raw_spin_unlock(&rtm->wait_lock);
mark_top_waiter_for_wakeup(T1)
raw_spin_unlock(&rtm->wait_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&rtm->wait_lock);
wake_up_top_waiter()
for (;;) {
if (__try_to_take_rt_mutex()) <- Succeeds
break;
...
}
try_to_wake_up(T1)
T1->state = T1->saved_state;
==> T1->state == TASK_XXX
ttwu_do_wakeup(T1)
FAIL ----> T1->state = TASK_RUNNING;
In most cases this is harmless because waiting for some event, which is the
usual reason for TASK_[UN]INTERRUPTIBLE, has to be safe against other forms
of spurious wakeups anyway.
But in case of TASK_TRACED this is actually fatal, because the task loses
the TASK_TRACED state. In consequence it fails to consume SIGSTOP which was
sent from the debugger and actually delivers SIGSTOP to the task which
breaks the ptrace mechanics and brings the debugger into an unexpected
state.
The cure is way simpler as figuring it out:
In a lock wakeup, check whether the task is actually blocked on a lock. If
yes, deliver it. If not, consider the wakeup spurious and exit the wake up
code without touching tasks state.
Reported-by: Mathias Koehrer <mathias.koehrer@etas.com>
Reported-by: David Hauck <davidh@netacquire.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: b/kernel/sched/core.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2174,8 +2174,18 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
* If this is a regular wakeup, then we can unconditionally
* clear the saved state of a "lock sleeper".
*/
- if (!(wake_flags & WF_LOCK_SLEEPER))
+ if (!(wake_flags & WF_LOCK_SLEEPER)) {
p->saved_state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * The task might not yet have reached schedule() and has
+ * taken over the lock already and restored the saved
+ * state. Prevent that this spurious wakeup destroys the saved
+ * state.
+ */
+ if (!tsk_is_pi_blocked(p))
+ goto out;
+ }
trace_sched_waking(p);
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RT] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-02 18:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH RT] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup David Hauck <davidh@netacquire.com> - 2017-06-02 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-03 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-06 14:20 +0200
[PATCH RT V2] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-06 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT V2] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-06-06 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RT V2] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-06-06 20:40 +0200
csiph-web