Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1632095

Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions

Show all headers | View raw

>>>>
>>>>> Also, this code in drop_other_mm_ref() looks dubious to me:
>>>>>
>>>>>     /* If this cpu still has a stale cr3 reference, then make sure
>>>>>        it has been flushed. */
>>>>>     if (this_cpu_read(xen_current_cr3) == __pa(mm->pgd))
>>>>>         load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
>>>>>
>>>>> If cr3 hasn't been flushed to the hypervisor because we're in a lazy
>>>>> mode, why would load_cr3() help?  Shouldn't this be xen_mc_flush()
>>>>> instead?
>>>>
>>>> load_cr3() actually ends with xen_mc_flush() by way of xen_write_cr3()
>>>> -> xen_mc_issue().
>>>
>>> xen_mc_issue() does:
>>>
>>>         if ((paravirt_get_lazy_mode() & mode) == 0)
>>>                 xen_mc_flush();
>>>
>>> I assume the load_cr3() is intended to deal with the case where we're
>>> in lazy mode, but we'll still be in lazy mode, right?  Or does it
>>> serve some other purpose?
>>
>> Of course. I can't read (I ignored the "== 0" part).
>>
>> Apparently the early version had an explicit flush but then it disappeared
>> (commit 9f79991d4186089e228274196413572cc000143b).
>>
>> The point of CR3 loading here, I believe, is to make sure the hypervisor
>> knows that the (v)CPU is no longer using the the mm's cr3 (we are loading
>> swapper_pgdir here).
> But that's what leave_mm() does.  To be fair, the x86 lazy TLB
> management is a big mess, and this came up because I'm trying to clean
> it up without removing it.

True. I don't know though if you can guarantee that leave_mm() (or
load_cr3() inside it) is actually called if we are in lazy mode.

>
> I suppose I can try to keep xen_exit_mmap() working.  Is there a
> simple way to try to unpin but to not treat it as an error if the
> hypervisor rejects it?

Even if we managed to craft a call in Linux to do this (current
xen_pgd_unpin() will result in a WARNing in xen_mc_flush()) this will
still cause a bunch of warnings in the hypervisor (if it is built as
DEBUG, but bad nevertheless).

But even without that, it is an error for a reason so how are you
planning to continue if you ignore it?

-boris

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

xen_exit_mmap() questions Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-26 23:00 +0200
  Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-04-27 00:50 +0200
    Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-27 01:00 +0200
      Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-04-27 03:00 +0200
        Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-27 03:10 +0200
          Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-04-27 15:30 +0200
            Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-27 18:50 +0200
              Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-04-27 22:10 +0200
                Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-04-27 23:30 +0200
        Re: xen_exit_mmap() questions Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-04-27 08:30 +0200
        Re: [Xen-devel] xen_exit_mmap() questions "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2017-04-27 09:50 +0200

csiph-web