Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #19021

Re: Shorter is not always better

Show all headers | View raw

Actually 1 byte contains 8 bits and can represent a number from 0 to 255

Stan

On 6/30/2022 10:21 PM, See Kes Seda Hetkel Siia Kirjutab wrote:
> 1 byte contains only 256 bits of information. Everyone make now Your own conclusions.
>
>
> ☏ : 372 5 3 9 0 0 6 6 0
> E-mail : he1983912[@]mail.ee
>
>
> Arno Welzel kirjutas Teisipäev, 23. november 2021 kl 12:52:33 UTC+2:
>> An simplified example from a real project:
>>
>> if (!($this->action[$key] ?? false)) {
>>
>> What it means:
>>
>> 1) $this->action[$key] ?? false
>>
>> This return $this->action[$key] if $this->action[$key] exists and is not
>> null or "false".
>>
>> 2) !( .... )
>>
>> Will negate the result - so the condition is true if $this->action[$key]
>> does not exist or is null.
>>
>> However to understand this you must know what the ?? operator means and
>> note the negation using ! in the beginning.
>>
>> When you did not create this code in the first place or try to find a
>> bug expressions like this are not really helpful.
>>
>> I would prefer a longer but easier to understand solution like this:
>>
>> if (!isset($this->statusActions[$key])
>> || null === $this->statusActions[$key]
>> ) {
>>
>> Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Arno Welzel
>> https://arnowelzel.de


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Shorter is not always better Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2021-11-23 11:52 +0100
  Re: Shorter is not always better "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2021-11-23 12:17 +0100
    Re: Shorter is not always better Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2021-11-24 09:57 +0000
      Re: Shorter is not always better "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2021-11-24 15:53 +0100
  Re: Shorter is not always better Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2021-11-23 18:42 -0500
  Re: Shorter is not always better Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-11-23 23:48 +0000
  Re: Shorter is not always better See Kes Seda Hetkel Siia Kirjutab <he1983912@gmail.com> - 2022-06-30 19:21 -0700
    Re: Shorter is not always better Stan Weiss <srweiss@erols.com> - 2022-07-01 01:05 -0400
      Re: Shorter is not always better Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2022-07-01 12:18 +0000
        Re: Shorter is not always better Stan Weiss <srweiss@erols.com> - 2022-07-01 09:08 -0400
          Re: Shorter is not always better Mateusz Viste <mateusz@xyz.invalid> - 2022-07-01 17:13 +0200

csiph-web