Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1577887
| From | Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7 |
| Date | 2017-02-09 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t92q5-1Gf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t90eB-98-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t91X4-1gs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t92q5-1Gf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> But what about my question? Do you think the changes are ok? I actually > made all be fallthrough, i.e. considered that the existing code was ok. Yes the changes are fine. -Andi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 18:00 +0100
Re: Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2017-02-09 19:50 +0100
Re: Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2017-02-09 20:20 +0100
Re: Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 20:30 +0100
Re: Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 20:20 +0100
csiph-web