Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #83909
| From | Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? |
| Date | 2022-04-30 10:40 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t4jsaj$f0p$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <t46frt$vq1$1@dont-email.me> <0ec1f3c0-406a-4ae5-8113-25875f96bed5n@googlegroups.com> <t4jkiv$ci8$1@dont-email.me> <t4jqm3$n8j$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t4jr4v$u6h$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 4/30/2022 10:20 AM, Manfred wrote:
>
> However, what you really should do is:
>
> using MyVector = std::vector<int>;
>
> ...
>
> for (MyVector::reverse_iterator it = v.rbegin(); v.rend() != it; ++it)
> {
> ...
> }
>
Well... yes and no. Reverse iterators are intended to encapsulate the
"offset by 1" idiom. In indexing terms it is equivalent to
for (std::size_t i = v.size(); i > 0; --i)
{
// Remember to work with v[i - 1] instead of v[i]
}
When wrapped into iterators it is superficially elegant, yet comes at a
price. In more performance-conscious situations it might prove to be too
expensive. In such contexts a better idea would be to learn and use the
alternative reverse iteration idioms, which are not that complicated.
--
Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 04:41 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-04-22 17:19 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 17:42 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2022-04-22 09:16 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Frederick Gotham <cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 09:22 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 10:24 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-04-22 20:33 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 17:57 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-22 19:18 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 19:40 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-22 20:00 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 04:21 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-25 05:48 +0000
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 05:27 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-25 05:40 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-04-25 16:48 +0100
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 03:51 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-30 08:28 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-30 10:30 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-30 19:20 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-30 23:20 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-30 10:40 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-30 19:12 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-26 05:20 +0000
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-29 16:12 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 15:44 +0300
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-10 07:18 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-05-10 14:34 +0000
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-24 05:43 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-10 20:34 +0300
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-06-04 07:57 -0700
csiph-web