Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #83720
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? |
| Date | 2022-04-25 05:27 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86fsm18i1c.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0c3601f0-fc8c-4bb9-a8b3-598ea1ca4a79n@googlegroups.com> <t45cmv$1omi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes:
> Graeme C. <graec58@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> for (int i=0; i<vf[gen-1].size(); i++) { // from previous gen
>
> std::vector::size() returns a value of type std::size_t. You
> shouldn't be using an int with it.
I don't want to start a holy war, but in this particular case
there is no problem comparing a signed type to a size_t (which is
an unsigned type). More generally, whenever a value of a signed
type has a non-negative value, as is obviously true in this
construct, then there is never a problem comparing a value of a
signed type to a value of an unsigned type.
Some people prefer using an unsigned type for indexing variables
like 'i' above, and that a reasonable style choice here IMO. But
there is nothing logically wrong with giving 'i' a signed type
here instead.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 04:41 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-04-22 17:19 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 17:42 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2022-04-22 09:16 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Frederick Gotham <cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 09:22 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 10:24 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-04-22 20:33 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 17:57 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-22 19:18 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 19:40 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-22 20:00 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? "Graeme C." <graec58@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 04:21 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-25 05:48 +0000
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 05:27 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-25 05:40 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-04-25 16:48 +0100
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 03:51 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-30 08:28 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-30 10:30 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-30 19:20 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-30 23:20 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-30 10:40 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-30 19:12 +0200
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-26 05:20 +0000
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-29 16:12 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 15:44 +0300
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-10 07:18 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-05-10 14:34 +0000
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-05-24 05:43 -0700
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-10 20:34 +0300
Re: This code is effective for modest-sized numbers, but can you tell what it does? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-06-04 07:57 -0700
csiph-web