Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #83793
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: getline() problem |
| Date | 2022-04-26 11:49 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t494b6$a1v$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <t45de2$1sln$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t46f86$or8$1@dont-email.me> <Kwz9K.23424$x9Ea.11744@fx45.iad> <t46np1$5uj$1@dont-email.me> <t480p6$1gdc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 4/26/22 01:43, Juha Nieminen wrote: > Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> wrote: >> It is the abstract language semantics implemented by the compiler. The >> compiler that actively uses UB as an optimization opportunity at a >> rather abstract level. > > By the way, doesn't this break the rule that optimizations must not change > the observable behavior of the program (other than by its execution time)? > > (Granted, I haven't actually checked that the standard actually mandates > that "optimizations must not change observable behavior". I'm not sure > where I have got that idea from. I would assume that the standard does > require this, in one form of another. ... You're confusing two different kinds of optimization. The first kind are the "as-if" optimizations. It's not true that such optimizations can't change the observable behavior, but that's close to being the correct description. For any given piece of code, because of the many things that the standard leaves unspecified, there's often multiple (sometimes, infinitely many) different sequences of observable behavior that are allowed. When a program is well-formed, the implementation is required generate one of those sequences. An optimization can change which of those sequences occurs, but it cannot allow a sequence not on that list to occur. The other kinds of optimizations are enabled by the fact that certain kinds of code can have undefined behavior under some circumstances. An implementation is free to ignore the possibility that those circumstances might occur, which sometimes enables optimizations for code that doesn't have undefined behavior.. For example, `b+a-b` for signed integer types can be optimized to a, because the overflow that might occur when b+a is evaluated has undefined behavior, so the compiler doesn't have to worry about that possibility. If the behavior were defined, the compiler might (depending upon the target platform) have to complicate the code in order to ensure that the defined behavior actually occurs. > ... Or does UB "take precedence" over > that requirement, making it void?) Undefined behavior releases an implementation from ALL requirements imposed by the standard, even than one.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-23 19:07 +0200
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-23 10:17 -0700
Re: getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-23 19:40 +0200
Re: getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-23 19:59 +0200
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-23 21:47 +0300
Re: getline() problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-25 06:00 +0000
Re: getline() problem Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-25 00:12 -0700
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 11:40 +0300
Re: getline() problem James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 11:37 -0400
Re: getline() problem Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-04-25 16:54 +0100
Re: getline() problem James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 12:29 -0400
Re: getline() problem scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-04-25 17:29 +0000
Re: getline() problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-25 20:17 +0200
Re: getline() problem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 10:19 -0700
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 10:41 -0700
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 21:58 +0300
Re: getline() problem scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-04-25 15:56 +0000
Re: getline() problem James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 13:12 -0400
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 11:03 -0700
Re: getline() problem scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-04-25 19:05 +0000
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 12:48 -0700
Re: getline() problem Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-25 21:46 +0100
Re: getline() problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-26 05:43 +0000
Re: getline() problem David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-26 09:36 +0200
Re: getline() problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-26 09:18 +0000
Re: getline() problem Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 02:47 -0700
Re: getline() problem Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-26 11:06 +0000
Re: getline() problem David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-26 15:52 +0200
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-26 07:04 -0700
Re: getline() problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-26 16:49 +0200
Re: getline() problem James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-26 12:01 -0400
Re: getline() problem James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-26 11:49 -0400
Re: getline() problem Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-04-25 20:23 +0200
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 10:33 -0700
Re: getline() problem "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 10:52 -0700
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 11:08 -0700
Re: getline() problem "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 21:18 -0700
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 22:04 -0700
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 22:06 +0300
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-25 13:02 -0700
Re: getline() problem Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2022-04-23 12:54 -0700
Re: getline() problem Montmorency <none@none.com> - 2022-04-23 14:45 -0700
Re: getline() problem Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 16:49 -0700
Re: getline() problem Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-24 01:04 +0100
Re: getline() problem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 18:24 -0700
Re: getline() problem Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-24 03:16 +0100
Re: getline() problem Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 22:51 -0700
Re: getline() problem Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-25 11:07 +0100
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-23 17:15 -0700
Re: getline() problem Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-04-23 18:23 -0700
Re: getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-24 05:28 +0200
Re: getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-25 12:41 +0200
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 14:33 +0300
Re: getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-25 18:53 +0200
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-25 22:08 +0300
Re: getline() problem Jivanmukta <jivanmukta@poczta.onet.pl> - 2022-04-26 09:01 +0200
Re: getline() problem Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-04-26 11:15 +0300
csiph-web