Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1566639
| From | Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies |
| Date | 2017-01-25 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3wAx-2Oh-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t3vXQ-2l3-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3vXQ-2l3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3whd-2sl-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3whd-2sl-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | SUSE Linux |
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:56:23 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 25/01/17 13:50, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:38:47 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> On 25/01/17 13:32, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >>> With a name like that, I assume that the ARM SCPI protocol is only
> >>> useful on the ARM architectures.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> >>> Fixes: 8f1498c03d15 ("firmware: arm_scpi: make it depend on MAILBOX instead of")
> >>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >>> Cc: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> >>
> >> I won't say you are wrong but the reason why it's named arm_scpi is
> >> because the protocol was developed by ARM. It doesnn't mean only
> >> ARM/ARM64 needs to use it, it can be used on any architecture for
> >> inter-processor communication using any communication technique
> >> (currently mailbox is the only supported in the driver)
> >
> > OK, thanks for the clarification. In practice, what other architectures
> > are using it?
>
> None, hence I didn't say you are wrong ;). I am fine having the check if
> it breaks for any other architecture with COMPILE_TEST.
Not sure what you mean here... The purpose of COMPILE_TEST is to allow
limiting the scope of a driver withing hurting the build test coverage.
> Also you have mentioned it fixes 8f1498c03d15, have you seen any
> regression with that commit ? If so, details in the commit would be
> good.
Before 8f1498c03d15, the dependency on ARM_MHU made the driver only
visible on ARM kernels. Since 8f1498c03d15, the driver is proposed to
all, which I think isn't correct. In that sense my proposed patch is
fixing a (user-friendliness) regression. But nothing serious.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-01-27 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-27 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 15:10 +0100
csiph-web