Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567967
| From | Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies |
| Date | 2017-01-27 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t4aHD-2dV-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <t3wAx-2Oh-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3wKe-2S1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3xmX-3lm-65@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3xwD-3oV-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <t4aHE-2dV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:15:45 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > (...) > > > As a side note, there's no finger-pointing implied by Fixes: tags. They > > > are only meant to help people backporting patches, so that they know if > > > something they backported is later fixed up. It does not imply anything > > > regarding how serious the problem was. > > > > Yes, but sometimes it's taken for stable tree > > Really? I would expect that only patches tagged with "Cc: > stable@vger.kernel.org", or explicitly sent to that list, are > considered for stable trees. Greg, you don't pick commits for stable > trees just because they have a "Fixes:" tag, do you? Sometimes I do, usually because the maintainer has forgotten to put the stable cc: (some subsystems are really bad about this), or because it fixes a patch that was previous backported to stable. I also take other patches that have no markings at all for stable trees, depending on what they do, or who recommends them. I try to scan all commits for stuff that should be included that someone forgot to put a stable@ cc: on. But, just because you put a Fixes: tag, does not mean it will always go into stable, because I do miss things at times. If you know it should go there, please always put the correct CC: tag. thanks, greg k-h
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-25 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-01-27 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-27 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-01-27 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Add hardware dependencies Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> - 2017-01-25 15:10 +0100
csiph-web