Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #83350
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries |
| Date | 2022-03-20 16:13 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <t18ceo$tbu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <t17mqk$cj4$1@dont-email.me> |
On 3/20/2022 10:04 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > I just wanted to measure the performance of unaligned accesses. > For accesses within a page the difference was below the measurement > error. Then I read that some processors put a penalty on unaligned > accesses that cross page-boundaries. So I wrote a little benchmark > that tries to measure this. But for my PCs, a Ryzen Threadripper > 3990X, a Ryzen 7 1800X and a Phenom X4 945 all measurements were > also within the measurement error. > So I'm interested if someone out there has a PC where unaligned > accesses crossing a page has a performance penalty. So here's the > benchmark in C++20: [...] Iirc, an unaligned atomic RMW would trigger a bus lock. Actually, somebody used it to trigger a system wide membar, take a look at QPI quiescence: https://chaelim.github.io/2017-04-29-qpi-quiescence I cannot find the damn original paper right now, but Windows API actually has an API that allows one to build asymmetric synchronization: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/processthreadsapi/nf-processthreadsapi-flushprocesswritebuffers
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-03-20 18:04 +0100
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-03-20 18:08 +0100
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-03-20 18:12 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-03-20 19:36 +0100
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-03-20 16:13 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-03-21 06:58 +0100
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-03-21 14:49 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-03-21 05:59 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-03-21 08:56 +0100
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-03-21 14:53 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-03-21 16:59 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-18 20:59 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 06:45 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-04-19 12:51 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 15:17 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-04-19 14:11 +0000
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 16:15 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 01:52 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 20:02 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 08:19 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 12:19 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:00 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 05:52 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 18:06 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 06:13 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 21:27 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 07:37 +0200
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-05-05 04:34 -0700
Re: speed of unaligned accesses that cross page-boundaries "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 12:16 -0700
csiph-web