Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #174115

Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone?

From Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone?
Date 2016-11-01 11:40 +0100
Message-ID <syEE1-7uL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sy0ZX-6XS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sylUJ-3Eg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <syrx7-7iz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <syulk-EP-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon 31 Oct 2016 at 23:38:36 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:

> On Monday 31 October 2016 20:34:32 Brian wrote:
> > I _do_
> >
> > > get offered the chance to switch landscape to portrait.
> >
> > You final sentence is what interests me.
> >
> > What would expect to happen if you chose "portrait" over "landscape"?
> >
> > Bear in mind most printers feed paper in short-edge first.
> 
> Portrait is the default.  If I do not ask it to turn a landscape image round, 
> a high percentage of it will be outside the printing area and I would have 
> tramlines at the top and bottom of the page.
> 
> Put a landscape image over the top of a portrait oriented sheet of paper and 
> you'll see what I mean.

I understand what you mean. If we are still talking in the context of
Evince, the "Landscape" and "Portrait" options are handled by Cairo, not
CUPS. If you select "Landscape", Cairo rotates *every" page in the PDF
by 90 degrees if the page width is *less* than the height. If you had a
842x595 sized pages they would not be rotated. Effectively, the option
does nothing. Or rather - it doesn't do what you think it does.

But (you say). the printout is OK. That's because you have the "Auto
Rotate and Centre" option ticked. Nothing to do with "Landscape"
selected.

Even if you forgot to tick "Auto Rotate and Centre" and sent a 842x595
page to the printer it will still be printed correctly because the
pdftopdf filter of cups-filters automatically rotates landscape pages by
90 degrees before printing.

-- 
Brian.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-10-30 17:20 +0100
  Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2016-10-30 17:40 +0100
  Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 17:40 +0100
  Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-10-30 17:50 +0100
    Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-10-30 18:00 +0100
      Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2016-10-30 21:10 +0100
  Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2016-10-30 18:00 +0100
  Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2016-10-30 21:10 +0100
    Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? maderios <maderios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:20 +0100
      Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 12:10 +0100
        Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> - 2016-10-31 13:00 +0100
          Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 13:40 +0100
            Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? maderios <maderios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 14:00 +0100
              Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 15:30 +0100
                Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 15:40 +0100
              Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 15:40 +0100
                Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 21:40 +0100
                Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 00:40 +0100
                Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-01 11:40 +0100
                Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 16:00 +0100
                Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-01 16:30 +0100

csiph-web