Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #174077
| From | maderios <maderios@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? |
| Date | 2016-10-31 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <syklX-2xj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sy0ZX-6XS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <syiDv-1zm-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <syjpT-1Qu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <syk2B-2qv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/31/2016 01:32 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 31 October 2016 11:57:45 Daniel Bareiro wrote: >> Hi, Lisi. >> >> On 31/10/16 08:07, Lisi Reisz wrote: >>>> "fit to page" function depends on printer driver settings, not printer >>>> software. >>>> You may change your cups/printer settings: >>>> http://localhost:631/ >>> >>> Where? In which section can you make the change you suggest? I remember >>> and have set a setting for turning pages if necessary, but not one for >>> fitting to printable area. >> >> Maybe it is a "lpr" option: >> >> https://www.cups.org/doc/options.html >> >> (See "Scaling to Fit") > > Thanks! That is helpful. If I hit the problem I'll look into doing it that > way. Evince worked last time I needed it to do so, and people are saying > that it still does. > > Lisi > It depends on many paramaters, for example, postcript printer or not postscript. In my case, postscript printer, with applications like evince, firefox, etc..., printing works same way with CTRL+P, then choose -> page handling -> 'fit to printable area' or 'shrink...' or 'none...'. I think it is the same for non postscript. -- Maderios
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-10-30 17:20 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2016-10-30 17:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 17:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-10-30 17:50 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? brian <brian@meadows.pair.com> - 2016-10-30 18:00 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2016-10-30 21:10 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2016-10-30 18:00 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2016-10-30 21:10 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? maderios <maderios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:20 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 12:10 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> - 2016-10-31 13:00 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 13:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? maderios <maderios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 14:00 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 15:30 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 15:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 15:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 21:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 00:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-01 11:40 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 16:00 +0100
Re: Alternative to Adobe Reader, anyone? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-11-01 16:30 +0100
csiph-web