Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1504180
| From | Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling |
| Date | 2016-10-19 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <su3a1-4te-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <stDyW-2Sj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <stDyX-2Sj-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <stJ1D-6T9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Subhash Jadavani
<subhashj@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 2016-10-18 07:28, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>
>> Add phy clock enable code to phy_power_on/off callbacks, and
>> remove explicit calls to enable these phy clocks from the
>> ufs-qcom hcd driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - staticized ufs_qcom_phy_enable(/disable)_ref_clk(),
>> - staticized ufs_qcom_phy_enable(/disable)_iface_clk()
>> - removed function declaration and export symbol for these APIs.
[snip]
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -1112,17 +1112,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba
>> *hba, bool on)
>> return 0;
>>
>> if (on) {
>> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_enable_iface_clk(host->generic_phy);
>> - if (err)
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_enable_ref_clk(host->generic_phy);
>> - if (err) {
>> - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s enable phy ref clock failed,
>> err=%d\n",
>> - __func__, err);
>> - ufs_qcom_phy_disable_iface_clk(host->generic_phy);
>> - goto out;
>> - }
>
>
> Now that you are moving these ref clk enable/disable to phy_power_on/off and
> these phy_power_on/off are called only in runtime suspend/resume (3 seconds
> after last UFS access).
> Goal is to disable the phy reference clock during aggressive gating (10ms
> from last UFS access) so shouldn't we call the phy_power_on/off from these
> setup_clocks() function as well?
>
So setup_clocks() is called for aggressive clock gating as well ?
If that's the case then yes, we may need to call. But we should try to
understand here. The phy_power_off turns off all the clocks - reflclk,
and other interface clocks. Do we want all of them to be turned off ?
phy_power_off will also turn off the PHY. Do we want all this for aggressive
clock gating ?
[snip]
Regards
Vivek
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 19:30 +0200
[PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 02:10 +0200
[PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-20 05:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 20:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
[PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers. Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers. Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-10-26 22:30 +0200
[PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-10-25 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-25 08:10 +0200
csiph-web