Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1503058

[PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers.

From Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers.
Date 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
Message-ID <stDID-2X6-79@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <stDyW-2Sj-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


remove() callback does a phy_exit() only and nothing else now.
The phy_exit() over the generic phy is called from the phy
consumer, and phy provider driver should not explicitly need to
call any phy_exit().
So discard the remove callback for qcom-ufs phy platform drivers.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
---

No change since v1.

 drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.c | 16 ----------------
 drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.c | 16 ----------------
 drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c          |  9 ---------
 3 files changed, 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.c
index 6ee5149..a305016 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.c
@@ -163,21 +163,6 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct phy *generic_phy = to_phy(dev);
-	struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy = get_ufs_qcom_phy(generic_phy);
-	int err = 0;
-
-	err = ufs_qcom_phy_remove(generic_phy, ufs_qcom_phy);
-	if (err)
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: ufs_qcom_phy_remove failed = %d\n",
-			__func__, err);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static const struct of_device_id ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_of_match[] = {
 	{.compatible = "qcom,ufs-phy-qmp-14nm"},
 	{},
@@ -186,7 +171,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_of_match);
 
 static struct platform_driver ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_driver = {
 	.probe = ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_probe,
-	.remove = ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_remove,
 	.driver = {
 		.of_match_table = ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm_of_match,
 		.name = "ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_14nm",
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.c
index 770087a..2db1fbb 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.c
@@ -219,21 +219,6 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct phy *generic_phy = to_phy(dev);
-	struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy = get_ufs_qcom_phy(generic_phy);
-	int err = 0;
-
-	err = ufs_qcom_phy_remove(generic_phy, ufs_qcom_phy);
-	if (err)
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: ufs_qcom_phy_remove failed = %d\n",
-			__func__, err);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static const struct of_device_id ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_of_match[] = {
 	{.compatible = "qcom,ufs-phy-qmp-20nm"},
 	{},
@@ -242,7 +227,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_of_match);
 
 static struct platform_driver ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_driver = {
 	.probe = ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_probe,
-	.remove = ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_remove,
 	.driver = {
 		.of_match_table = ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm_of_match,
 		.name = "ufs_qcom_phy_qmp_20nm",
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
index f639a7c..b8f9286 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
@@ -645,15 +645,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate_phy(struct phy *generic_phy, bool is_rate_B)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate_phy);
 
-int ufs_qcom_phy_remove(struct phy *generic_phy,
-			struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy)
-{
-	phy_power_off(generic_phy);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_remove);
-
 int ufs_qcom_phy_exit(struct phy *generic_phy)
 {
 	struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy = get_ufs_qcom_phy(generic_phy);
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when  rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 20:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when  rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 23:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when  rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 19:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit  callback Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 02:10 +0200
  [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 22:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 19:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-19 21:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-20 05:50 +0200
  [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function  declarations Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 20:50 +0200
  [PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers. Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback  for drivers. Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-10-26 22:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 16:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit  path Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-18 22:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-10-25 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and  ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-10-25 08:10 +0200

csiph-web