Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #82791
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Inline functions and locals |
| Date | 2022-01-16 23:51 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ss375r$gjs$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <srqkvk$3vi$1@dont-email.me> <srrmd6$1bo0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <srs97q$qov$1@dont-email.me> <ss2vdc$eo5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ss34s6$53h$1@dont-email.me> |
On 1/16/2022 11:12 PM, David Brown wrote: > On 17/01/2022 06:38, Juha Nieminen wrote: >> Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> As a historical note, it is true that keyword `inline` was originally >>> introduced specifically to "suggest" inlining of function bodies at call >>> sites. But it quickly became clear that it is useless and unnecessary in >>> this role. As a consequence, its role was refocused to being a "ODR >>> defeater" - a completely different purpose. >> >> And as a side note, the C standard also added support for 'inline' >> functions, except that it's a different and very weird version of it that >> to this day I still don't fully understand. It's like an 'inline' that's >> *not* an "ODR defeater". (It's so confusing that the vast, vast majority >> of C programmers just write "static inline" to get around the confusing >> part.) >> > > Yes, "inline" functions in C are a bit odd, and the semantics are not > the same as in C++. As you say, the most common usage (and the only way > I use it) is to write "static inline" for functions to replace what > might pre-C99 have been a function-like macro. The "inline" here is not > actually very significant - any decent C compiler will make its own > decisions about actual inlining optimisations, so a plain "static" > function would have the same effect. To me, at least, the "static > inline" is a documentation of how you see the function and expect it to > be used. [...] Imvvvho, using inline is almost akin to almost begging the compiler to actually inline the function. It certainly can say f-you, and give the programmer the proverbial middle finger at the same time! For some reason it kind of makes me think of the register keyword... Now, it would be funny if a compiler would output something like: this function cannot be inlined, go ahead and try turning on link time optimization, and try again? ;^)
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-12 16:34 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-12 17:38 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-12 12:47 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-13 07:00 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-13 10:45 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-17 12:55 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 15:14 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-17 10:24 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 19:46 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-13 19:30 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-01-13 12:46 +0200
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-13 15:38 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-13 17:51 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-14 11:22 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-14 04:02 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Manfred <invalid@invalid.add> - 2022-01-14 17:30 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-14 16:49 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-14 16:40 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-14 11:28 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-14 08:34 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-14 11:26 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-14 18:47 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-14 08:43 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-17 05:38 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 08:12 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 23:51 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 23:55 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 11:35 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-17 09:50 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 14:39 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 15:34 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 15:50 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 03:42 -0700
Re: Inline functions and locals "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 08:48 -0700
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-16 23:53 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 15:29 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-17 12:40 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-17 10:13 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-17 16:28 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 22:55 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-18 11:32 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-18 19:03 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-18 17:22 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-18 09:20 +0100
csiph-web