Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #82794
| From | Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Inline functions and locals |
| Date | 2022-01-17 09:50 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ss3e61$908$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <srqkvk$3vi$1@dont-email.me> <srrmd6$1bo0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <srs97q$qov$1@dont-email.me> <ss2vdc$eo5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ss34s6$53h$1@dont-email.me> |
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: > Yes, "inline" functions in C are a bit odd, and the semantics are not > the same as in C++. As you say, the most common usage (and the only way > I use it) is to write "static inline" for functions to replace what > might pre-C99 have been a function-like macro. The "inline" here is not > actually very significant - any decent C compiler will make its own > decisions about actual inlining optimisations, so a plain "static" > function would have the same effect. To me, at least, the "static > inline" is a documentation of how you see the function and expect it to > be used. The difference between a 'static' (or 'static inline') function and a (non-static) 'inline' function is that in the former case the function gets instantiated as many times as there are compilation units that call it (or in every compilation unit that includes the header, regardless of whether anything calls it or not, as some more primitive C compilers do. Yes, they exist.) In the latter case the function is instantiated in the executable binary only once, just like in C++ (but in C you have to explicitly tell *where* it's instantiated, while in C++ it's automatic.) Since as far as I remember you cannot have 'static' variables inside an 'inline' function (unlike in C++), the only possible situation that I can think of where you have to make an 'inline' function non-static is if the function needs to have a unique pointer (eg. if you for some reason need to compare function pointers). Or if you need to squeeze even the last bits out of the executable binary size and do not want the function to be duplicated. Sometimes you can get away with using (non-static) 'inline' without specifying where the function should be instantiated (if the compiler never generates an actual function call), but I think that's non-standard behavior.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-12 16:34 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-12 17:38 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-12 12:47 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-13 07:00 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-13 10:45 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-17 12:55 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 15:14 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-17 10:24 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 19:46 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-13 19:30 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-01-13 12:46 +0200
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-13 15:38 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-13 17:51 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-14 11:22 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-14 04:02 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Manfred <invalid@invalid.add> - 2022-01-14 17:30 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-14 16:49 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-01-14 16:40 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-14 11:28 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-14 08:34 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-14 11:26 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-14 18:47 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-14 08:43 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-17 05:38 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 08:12 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 23:51 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-01-16 23:55 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-01-17 11:35 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-17 09:50 +0000
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 14:39 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 15:34 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 15:50 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 03:42 -0700
Re: Inline functions and locals "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 08:48 -0700
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-16 23:53 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 15:29 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-17 12:40 +0100
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-17 10:13 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-17 16:28 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-17 22:55 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-18 11:32 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-18 19:03 -0500
Re: Inline functions and locals Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-01-18 17:22 -0800
Re: Inline functions and locals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-18 09:20 +0100
csiph-web