Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > ger.ct > #536199

Re: Sugar in the morning...

From Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups ger.ct
Subject Re: Sugar in the morning...
Date 2022-01-01 11:18 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <sqp9pd$1mb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <j39hr1F1andU1@mid.individual.net> <sqoqq4$2ac$1@tota-refugium.de> <h750tgpfdes3nq8sr5nn8niuhvp77i69rt@4ax.com> <j3amhoF798aU2@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 01.01.2022 10:51, Michael Bode wrote:

>> Naja, es war zumindest nicht ereignislos.
> 
> 2 Fälle von illegalem Feuerwerk. Tja, der Staat hat ja auch tatkräftig mitgeholfen und Anreize zum
> selberbasteln von Böllern geboten.

Niederlande:
https://9gag.com/gag/aegeZnm
https://9gag.com/gag/aZrg1PV

In einem anderen, hier nicht gezeigten Fall, gab es Todesopfer.

Auch wenn es "hier" recht ruhig war, ein mal gab es einen Wumms in der 
Ferne und es hat hier trotzdem alles gewackelt. In den Nachrichten stand 
allerdings noch nichts.

Back to ger.ct | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Sugar in the morning... Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2021-12-31 23:25 +0000
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2021-12-31 23:41 +0000
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 07:02 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 09:47 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 10:05 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2022-01-01 10:41 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... "Dr. Joachim Neudert" <neudert@5sl.org> - 2022-01-01 10:46 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:09 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Diedrich Ehlerding <diedrich.ehlerding@t-online.de> - 2022-01-01 11:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:00 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:12 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 02:24 -0800
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:25 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:40 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-01-02 09:30 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-01-02 21:18 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:02 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 11:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 11:20 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:11 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 12:31 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-01 13:00 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:41 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 21:45 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Peter Veith <veith@snafu.de> - 2022-01-02 07:03 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 02:22 -0800
          Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:02 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 13:43 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 15:08 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 15:15 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-01-05 15:02 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-05 18:52 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2022-01-05 18:27 +0000
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-05 19:44 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Dr. Joachim Neudert <neudert@5sl.org> - 2022-01-05 18:57 +0000
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-05 20:23 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Ebert <mx300@gmx.net> - 2022-01-05 23:46 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-06 07:45 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Ebert <mx300@gmx.net> - 2022-01-06 15:20 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-06 17:04 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-06 21:00 +0100
                Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2022-01-05 22:23 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:47 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 21:57 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:10 +0100
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 21:31 +0100
            Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:53 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 22:00 +0100
              Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 13:05 -0800
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-01-01 10:51 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 11:18 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Mike Grantz <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2022-01-01 10:30 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-01 12:02 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-01 12:19 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-01-01 04:36 -0800
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Christian Schumacher <cs.spam@nurfuerspam.de> - 2022-01-01 20:22 +0000
          Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:59 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-02 09:42 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-01-02 09:20 +0100
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-01-01 21:16 +0100
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-01-03 04:44 -0800
    Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 13:50 +0100
      Re: Sugar in the morning... hc.ahlmann@gmx.de (HC Ahlmann) - 2022-01-03 17:36 +0100
        Re: Sugar in the morning... Stephan Bumberger <bumberger@gmail.com> - 2022-01-03 20:43 +0100
  Re: Sugar in the morning... Martin Ebert <mx300@gmx.net> - 2022-01-04 23:56 +0100

csiph-web