[PATCH net 01/13] rxrpc: Accesses of rxrpc_local::service need to be RCU managed

From	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	[PATCH net 01/13] rxrpc: Accesses of rxrpc_local::service need to be RCU managed
Date	2016-10-06 12:10 +0200
Message-ID	<spdMJ-79a-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<spdMJ-79a-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Show all headers | View raw

struct rxrpc_local->service is marked __rcu - this means that accesses of
it need to be managed using RCU wrappers.  There are two such places in
rxrpc_release_sock() where the value is checked and cleared.  Fix this by
using the appropriate wrappers.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index 44c9c2b0b190..2d59c9be40e1 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -678,9 +678,9 @@ static int rxrpc_release_sock(struct sock *sk)
 	sk->sk_state = RXRPC_CLOSE;
 	spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
 
-	if (rx->local && rx->local->service == rx) {
+	if (rx->local && rcu_access_pointer(rx->local->service) == rx) {
 		write_lock(&rx->local->services_lock);
-		rx->local->service = NULL;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(rx->local->service, NULL);
 		write_unlock(&rx->local->services_lock);
 	}

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH net 01/13] rxrpc: Accesses of rxrpc_local::service need to  be RCU managed David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-10-06 12:10 +0200

csiph-web