Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372811

Re: Ping: Owl

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-09-25, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-25, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:46:47 PM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> On 2016-09-25, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:29:00 PM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>> >
>>> > (snip)
>>> >
>>> >> >> This is a test forgery with permission of the email account owner.
>>> >> >> Steve, I said most all headers can be forged.  Both client and
>>> >> >> server must allow it.  Here I stripped Path and Xref, and gave
>>> >> >> it a new message-id and organization.  Path preload is against
>>> >> >> my TOS, Xref only specifies article number and is meaningless
>>> >> >> outside that server, Organization because the server adds one
>>> >> >> if I don't, and of course it needs a unique message id.
>>> >> > 
>>> >> > Didn't fool it but the headers aren't exactly the same
>>> >> 
>>> >> Could be login/messag-id tracking, but what do you mean
>>> >> by "didn't fool it"?  Do you mean because it's not a unique
>>> >> post here:
>>> >> 
>>> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!profile/comp.os.linux.advocacy/APn2wQex7ZDHcyvKXrYEFomvvGEe6q-7LlNoING2TTevZvRIYzflnEJjf7Vl4bCLnGnc9SiNpURO
>>> >
>>> > I think so. I have to login to send a post and when I do 
>>> > it's say 'me' instead of 'Steve Carroll' so I can spot them 
>>> > right away.
>>> >
>>> >> Would it have made a difference if I had not posted as a followup,
>>> >> but instead as a new post?
>>> >
>>> > I dunno. So is my pgp working when I manually do the
>>> > line lengths? Or will that string you posted above break?
>>> 
>>> Have you uploaded your public to a couple of the big key servers?
>>
>> I thought I did. I wish I could get slrn back. I screwed up the .slrnrc
>> file's replyto line, it was working, then I went to add something that
>> I probably didn't need to add (port number) and blew that line out. I
>> thought I've been putting it back in properly but it's not working :(
>
> I need a virgin slrnrc file. There should be one in the installation
> somewhere. Mine has been hacked for the last three years and it about 3x
> the normal size. I have a ton of re-mapped keys for vim style movement
> which is starting to get in the way of things like this macro. I think I
> should go back to a more generic use of slrn.
 
I just wrote one from scratch... writing this reply in vim

>
> - -- 
> Marek Novotny
> https://github.com/marek-novotny

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:36 -0700
  Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:36 -0700
    Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:14 -0700
      Re: Ping: Owl "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 22:28 +0000
        Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:44 -0700
          Re: Ping: Owl Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:46 +0000
            Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:03 -0700
              Re: Ping: Owl Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:14 +0000
                Re: Ping: Owl Steven Petruzzellis <OLnewscat3three@news.eternal-september.org> - 2016-09-25 23:20 +0000
                Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:29 -0700
                Re: Ping: Owl Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:47 +0000
          Re: Ping: Owl "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 23:10 +0000

csiph-web