Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372808

Re: Ping: Owl

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:29:00 PM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> 
> (snip)
> 
>> >> This is a test forgery with permission of the email account owner.
>> >> Steve, I said most all headers can be forged.  Both client and
>> >> server must allow it.  Here I stripped Path and Xref, and gave
>> >> it a new message-id and organization.  Path preload is against
>> >> my TOS, Xref only specifies article number and is meaningless
>> >> outside that server, Organization because the server adds one
>> >> if I don't, and of course it needs a unique message id.
>> > 
>> > Didn't fool it but the headers aren't exactly the same
>> 
>> Could be login/messag-id tracking, but what do you mean
>> by "didn't fool it"?  Do you mean because it's not a unique
>> post here:
>> 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!profile/comp.os.linux.advocacy/APn2wQex7ZDHcyvKXrYEFomvvGEe6q-7LlNoING2TTevZvRIYzflnEJjf7Vl4bCLnGnc9SiNpURO
> 
> I think so. I have to login to send a post and when I do 
> it's say 'me' instead of 'Steve Carroll' so I can spot them 
> right away.
> 
>> Would it have made a difference if I had not posted as a followup,
>> but instead as a new post?
> 
> I dunno. So is my pgp working when I manually do the
> line lengths? Or will that string you posted above break?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX6FNVAAoJELnOYK54exUC4/YQALM1sG2QFZuRAgoqSLSoq2W0
> WPJ7B5bt+V8hWwohz6Q351qD7s5TUnqumrQ/Eif6tqLE6wYP41vRXmfrTP9mFCAi
> BTT9q9BL/xAIObPSHJjfIBjhLu5s/SeTBcLZMupQcPmtFX8nU4ji/4joRnY0aVcr
> bHw8crl5jsx/zUkg6SmKbm2USpRTUAF9evNhB3UhOjjsQ/nfhfEU2Puf1Sy8WWbI
> 2nc1fTudlcAP7l3o7izoQJdIwB8Gzdt2T6ArFHBH9T0NWrukkIT6l7w5ai6dviqM
> 0S3WhHh5mYhyajRfEZzMgTsNQUhaldmmCDSCamiv4GyFCSo4lq3gbXRivEZwk5xL
> 1Oxpyo+20Vc3P6jfW905MVS+RyzaSH3zGAx1VMmnjSwaJJAbxNMD+fpuKimpFEQG
> dhEl65n4ISa1iN1pRbPFRZOqMt+75wyfHUzs96WUvLitiMMvwN94yjvAV0mpWiz1
> l49FEaHU5akupoTFLTDW4WNK10Ai4mEzkCm9pxOL8wwXJTc04ZKytjLs+tS7mvA3
> 3E/BFcSRieqqC8r8ELZq6p23tRIqbSdieQhDxuJsp7BOHeNMgaIrJoc7JjAV4r2C
> zbPBWlFYDGzXRCHMzlsFcZ7v+Y0rYgFHxjSdFvhRNX2pwEmYKDGTK2C/fMAUntZF
> YYfQCwyj55Rj8NvhOUGr
> =H6w8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

Good sig on this post.  That wrap is ok.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:36 -0700
  Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 13:36 -0700
    Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:14 -0700
      Re: Ping: Owl "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 22:28 +0000
        Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:44 -0700
          Re: Ping: Owl Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:46 +0000
            Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:03 -0700
              Re: Ping: Owl Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:14 +0000
                Re: Ping: Owl Steven Petruzzellis <OLnewscat3three@news.eternal-september.org> - 2016-09-25 23:20 +0000
                Re: Ping: Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:29 -0700
                Re: Ping: Owl Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:47 +0000
          Re: Ping: Owl "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 23:10 +0000

csiph-web