Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #166281

Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-07-02, Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> wrote:
> in 667507 20160701 214058 Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote:
>>Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> wrote:
> Under the circumstances the result should be null and void and the lying
> politicians jailed.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dosmKwrAbI
>
>
There is a precedent, During the run-up to the Lisbon Agreement, a
referendum was run in Ireland for agreement with it. The result was
"No".. Immediate panic in official Ireland.

It simply was not as significent as the British "Brexit" thing, but
showed increasing disenchantment with the EU. The Irish like
being in the EU, but dislike the niggling reulations that it brings.

Official Ireland decided that the referendum be rerun, aand it was
passed the second time. Coming out of the polling station, after
voting 'no', I met a friend and observed that it must be the worse
insult that a country be given, that it be forced to rerun a referendum.

All he could say, was that the country was not a disgrace in Europe
any more. 

If the British referendum was rerun soon, the anti- people would
accuse the EU of forcing that. The result would probably be the same.



-- 
greymaus.ireland.ie
 .
  .
...

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-07-02 06:59 +0100
  Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-07-02 07:40 +0100
    Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-02 12:59 +0000
  Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust mausg@mail.com - 2016-07-02 08:09 +0000
  Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-07-02 19:53 -0400
    Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-03 07:11 -0400
      Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-07-03 11:40 -0400
        Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-07-03 17:22 +0100
          Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-03 16:15 -0400
            Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-07-03 20:38 +0000
              Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-03 18:55 -0400
                Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-07-04 06:53 +0000
            Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-07-03 23:33 +0200
              Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust mausg@mail.com - 2016-07-04 09:34 +0000
            Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-03 22:39 +0100
              Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-07-04 00:20 +0200
                Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust mausg@mail.com - 2016-07-04 09:43 +0000
              Re: "Computer & Automation" later issues--anti-establishment thrust Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-03 18:55 -0400

csiph-web