Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #58203
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: RTF vs XCode |
| Date | 2014-03-28 23:56 +0000 |
| Organization | Miskatonic U |
| Message-ID | <slrnljc30m.14c6.g.kreme@amelia.local> (permalink) |
| References | <chine.bleu-DE94A3.20260927032014@news.eternal-september.org> <290320140844592292%YourName@YourISP.com> <lh4t1v$a2s$1@solani.org> <290320141203389947%YourName@YourISP.com> |
In message <290320141203389947%YourName@YourISP.com> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > In article <lh4t1v$a2s$1@solani.org>, ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> > wrote: >> Your Name wrote: >> > Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> My 10.6 has gone the way of all flesh and with it the ability to properly >> >> edit RTF in XCode. Are there any other edittors that can edit RTF with >> >> all the usual functionality like auto-indent? >> > >> > BBEdit is the more usual text editor used by programmers and HTML >> > website creators, but I don't know if it handles RTF. RTF isn't really >> > needed for such an editor when the colouring, etc. can be done >> > on-the-fly on screen. http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/ >> >> Yes, BBEdit is the ultimate text editor. > ... >> >> The problem with BBEdit is that it's relatively expensive for non-pro >> users, and the learning curve is rather steep... > The Bare Bones company also makes free(?) TextWrangler, but I'm not > sure how much functionality has been missing from it compared to > BBEdit. > http://www.barebones.com/products/textwrangler/ For most people not much. It is still a phenomenal text editor and supports full regex searches. The main things missing are project windows, shell worksheets, and HTML tools. -- Here are people who know that there is no steel, only the idea of steel. Footnote: But they still use forks, or, at least, the idea of forks. There may, as the philosopher says, be no spoon, although this begs the question of why there is the idea of soup.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RTF vs XCode Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-27 20:26 -0700
Re: RTF vs XCode Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-28 04:11 +0000
Re: RTF vs XCode Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-27 23:35 -0700
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-28 14:30 +0100
Re: RTF vs XCode Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-28 06:39 -0700
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 08:41 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 08:44 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-28 23:28 +0100
Re: RTF vs XCode Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-28 23:06 +0000
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 12:24 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-29 08:02 +0000
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-29 13:17 +0100
Re: RTF vs XCode Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-29 18:02 +0000
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-30 03:00 +0200
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-30 09:55 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-29 22:27 +0000
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-30 03:16 +0200
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-29 12:49 +0100
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-29 12:30 +0100
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 12:03 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-28 23:56 +0000
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 12:20 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-29 12:55 +0100
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 12:27 +1200
Re: RTF vs XCode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-29 12:32 +1200
csiph-web