Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #162888
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: redeclaration of enumerators? |
| Date | 2021-10-01 09:24 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <sj6d3o$fej$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <sj1vgt$lfe$1@dont-email.me> <sj2adj$emu$1@dont-email.me> <87tui2j1m3.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <sj44gi$odk$1@dont-email.me> <V5k5J.59463$6U3.29625@fx43.iad> |
On 30/09/2021 16:47, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>> On 30/09/2021 03:25, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>>> [...]
>>>> With strong enumerations, you shouldn't even be thinking of them as
>>>> having an integer value - it doesn't make sense to compare the "value"
>>>> of a "colours" enumeration element with one from a "lights" enumeration.
>>>> That is a large part of the point of having better enumeration types
>>>> than were available in C.
>>>
>>> C++ scoped enumeration types do have well-defined integer
>>> representations. You can even specify them in the declaration:
>>>
>>> enum class foo { zero = 0, one = 1 };
>>>
>>> There's no implicit conversion from foo to int, but you can use a cast;
>>> for example (int)foo::zero == 0.
>>>
>>
>> Sure - and for some use-cases that might be useful.
>>
>> But I think that in most cases, it is not at all helpful to think about
>> the underlying integer values. You get cleaner, safer, more portable
>> code if you treat the enumeration constants as being abstract symbols
>> that are members of the particular type without any other semantics or
>> meaning.
>
> But then you need something akin to the Pascal "PRED" and "SUCC" functions.
>
Sometimes, yes, that would be nice. Often, however, your code is safer
if you /don't/ have such features. It might seem like a good idea to
have "go to next state" in your state machine, rather than giving the
next state explicitly, but you'll regret it when someone adds a new
state to the enumeration somewhere in the middle.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
redeclaration of enumerators? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 10:39 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 16:21 -0500
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 14:57 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 15:23 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 01:15 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-28 23:31 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 15:36 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 15:03 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 16:46 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 16:08 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 20:14 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 13:37 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 18:25 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-30 12:45 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 07:36 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 09:20 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 11:24 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 04:49 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 13:06 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Tony Oliver <guinness.tony@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 05:24 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 13:32 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 05:32 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 13:43 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 06:13 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 06:29 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-10-01 15:30 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 08:28 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-10-01 17:08 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:12 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 15:37 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 15:30 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 19:12 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 19:06 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 15:32 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 15:38 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 17:40 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-02 12:16 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-02 15:34 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-02 15:16 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 13:58 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-10-01 17:21 -0400
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 14:56 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-02 12:21 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-30 14:47 +0000
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:10 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 09:24 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 12:43 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 03:40 +0000
csiph-web