Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #162903
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: redeclaration of enumerators? |
| Date | 2021-10-01 15:30 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87lf3ckebg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <sj6csf$dvm$1@dont-email.me> <sj6nkg$4am$1@dont-email.me> <e468277c-6174-4591-ac91-4ba7dcbf893cn@googlegroups.com> <sj6tkk$m4p$1@dont-email.me> <6ce76fc9-f5ce-4cb4-9750-326b0a0a2ce0n@googlegroups.com> |
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes:
> There are three distinct situations I see.
>
> The first is where the enum is a flag or comibation of flags which is used to
> pass multiple booleans /small integers efficiently.
I would not call that an enum.
> The second is where the enum is a collection of labels which defines a set,
> but where there is no paticular mathematical relationship. For example
> amino acids in proteins.
Again, I'd not call that an enum. enum implies enumeration so there
should be a successor and predecessor operation.
> The third is where you have a relationship such that the members are ordered.
> This might be a natural order (BABY, TODDLER, CHILD, TEENAGER, YOUTH,
> MIDDLEAGED, PENSIONER), or it might be a strong social convention (A,
> B, C ...).
This one is an enum!
If I were making it up from a blank slate, I'd have collections of
symbols which might or might not be ordered:
NAMES { verbose, logging, no_splash } flags;
SET OF flags options;
/* succ(verbose) not defined but name_of(verbose) == "verbose" */
ORDERED NAMES { GCSE, A_Level, Degree, Postgraduate } qualifications;
/* succ(GCSE) == A_Level and ord(Degree) == 2 */
> The other logical situation is an ordering, with the added stipulation
> that the intervals be the same. I suggest that an enum is not suitable
> for this kind of data.
Except, presumably, when the interval is 1? That's almost the textbook
definition of an enumeration.
> If the intervals are the same, they must be
> based on some mathematical measure,and it's best to store that value
> explicitly.
I agree that this is much more specialised.
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
redeclaration of enumerators? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 10:39 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 16:21 -0500
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 14:57 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 15:23 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 01:15 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-28 23:31 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 15:36 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 15:03 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 16:46 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 16:08 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-29 20:14 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 13:37 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 18:25 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-30 12:45 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 07:36 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 09:20 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 11:24 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 04:49 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 13:06 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Tony Oliver <guinness.tony@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 05:24 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 13:32 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 05:32 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 13:43 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 06:13 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 06:29 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-10-01 15:30 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 08:28 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-10-01 17:08 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:12 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 15:37 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 15:30 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 19:12 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 19:06 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 15:32 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 15:38 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-01 17:40 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-02 12:16 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-02 15:34 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-10-02 15:16 +0100
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 13:58 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-10-01 17:21 -0400
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 14:56 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-02 12:21 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-30 14:47 +0000
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:10 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-10-01 09:24 +0200
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 12:43 -0700
Re: redeclaration of enumerators? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 03:40 +0000
csiph-web