Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usage.english > #1146191

Re: 'shake well'

From Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net>
Newsgroups alt.usage.english
Subject Re: 'shake well'
Date 2026-07-04 08:39 -0400
Message-ID <sivh4l5vubeeuop9lr4ismsf75d3nupvm1@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <36rg4lhpgd2dmaq9uk5j6m8rgon3nkjiu8@4ax.com> <112aa1p$3ukk2$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 4 Jul 2026 08:43:05 +0200, Bertel Lund Hansen
<rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> wrote:

>Den 04.07.2026 kl. 04.33 skrev Rich Ulrich:
>
>> But my lifetime experience with other sealed containers has
>> taught me that a juice container (say) with sediment on the
>> bottom will NOT be mixed by shaking unless there is air inside.
>> You can shake it and SEE that the sediment is not affected.
>> But they still may say, 'shake well'.
>> 
>> 
>> Half-empty makes for effective mix-by-shaking. which may  be
>> okay if you are pouring everything back together.
>> 
>> If the container is transparent (even, just at the bottom), you
>> can see what is stuck on the bottom.  But what do you do for
>> a cardboard container?
>
>My father provides orange juice for me when I visit him. I don't usually 
>drink juice due to the acidic contents, but I enjoy doing so occasionally.
>
>The container is made of cardboard. If it is full, I just pour a glass 
>and drink it. Then I can shake the container for the next glass(es).

Oh!  This leads me to notice that I'm being obsessive-compulsive. 
There is no great virtue in having two portions that are identical, 
which is what I was focussed on. 


>
>Related - and Danish:
>There's a word about the sediment that may be found in wine bottles 
>("bærme"). The same word can be used about people meaning that they are 
>worthless. I haven't heard that word since my parents explained it to me 
>and I haven't used it about anything else than the residue in wine 
>bottles - which I think I have seen once.

-- 
Rich Ulrich

Back to alt.usage.english | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-03 22:33 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-04 00:03 -0400
    Re: 'shake well' Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-03 23:05 -0700
    Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 12:02 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-04 08:46 -0400
        Re: 'shake well' Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-04 20:26 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-04 09:28 -0400
    Re: 'shake well' Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-06 15:33 +0100
      Re: 'shake well' richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-06 14:52 +0000
      Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-06 17:04 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 11:14 -0400
      Re: 'shake well' athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-06 15:41 +0000
        Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-06 20:34 +0200
          Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-06 22:34 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-06 20:34 +0100
      Re: 'shake well' rcpj@panix.com (Pierre Jelenc) - 2026-07-06 20:21 +0000
  Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 06:38 +0100
    Re: 'shake well' Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-04 08:49 +0200
  Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 06:51 +0100
    Re: 'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-04 08:48 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 08:28 +0200
  Re: 'shake well' Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-04 08:43 +0200
    Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 08:02 +0100
      Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-04 11:53 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-04 20:05 +0100
    Re: 'shake well' Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-07-04 22:59 +1200
      Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 16:25 +0200
        Re: 'shake well' HVS <office@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk> - 2026-07-04 16:11 +0100
          Re: 'shake well' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 16:27 +0100
          Re: 'shake well' richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-04 15:40 +0000
            Re: 'shake well' Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-07-05 10:06 +0100
        Re: 'shake well' Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-07-04 16:00 +0000
        Re: 'shake well' Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-07-05 18:05 +1200
          Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-05 08:45 +0200
    Re: 'shake well' Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-04 08:39 -0400
  Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-04 11:53 +0200
    Re: 'shake well' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-04 12:05 +0200
      Re: 'shake well' liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-04 12:29 +0100
        Re: 'shake well' Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 00:20 -0700
        Re: 'shake well' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-05 09:22 +0200
  Re: 'shake well' "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-04 21:49 +0800
  Re: 'shake well' Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-04 20:01 +0100

csiph-web