Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.crypt > #50199

Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest.

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/27/2021 1:43 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/26/2021 9:01 PM, Rich wrote:
>> Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Also, you have a website!  Nice.  So, try to get your cipher up 
>>> on your site.  So, anybody can easily play with it?
>> 
>> That won't happen.  Because if he put it up on the website so 
>> people could play with it, it would be broken within a day.
> 
> Even if was broken within a half an hour, well, he could use this 
> wonderful occurrence to learn exactly how they broke it.

He doesn't really care if it's broken or not.
All he cares about is being the center of attention, so that you respond
to his posts.

> The code would be on the site for all to see. Then, he can start to 
> learn some ways to make it stronger? Perhaps?

He obviously doesn't care about making his "code" stronger. If he did, he
would have by now. All he wants is for you to keep responding to his posts,
so that he is the center of attention.

Right now, with two people talking about him, without him doing anything,
he's got a mental hardon. I knew someone in high school who had a
Narcissistic Personality Disorder. He would come over to your house
claiming to help you with your homework, because he "knew everything".
But by the time he went home you had done all of his homework for him,
correcting all of his mistakes, and he had done absolutely nothing.

This guy Austin reminds me so much of that narcissist back in high school.


> I can see how he can get better and better by taking all of the 
> breaks and details therein to make it harder and harder for the 
> breakers to bust? Sound Kosher at all? A learning process. Who 
> knows... After a nice learning process, his cipher might be getting 
> better and better. Is this a damn pipe dream? Like a massive bong 
> load, for all of the stoners out there? yikes!
> 
> 
>> By keeping it vaporware he can avoid the embarrassment of yet 
>> another cipher broken in a day.
> 
> Is it truly vaporware? I mean, he does have ADA code right? Well,
> how many tools exist that can convert certain ADA code into, say 
> JavaScript?
> 
> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.ada/c/8RupAuYYiiA
> 
> Is an ADA to JavaScript transpiler vaporware? Ohhh, shit. Damn..
> 
> I actually got emscripten to work from time to time.

Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 03:45 -0700
  Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-26 12:12 +0100
  Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 06:19 -0700
  Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-26 17:07 +0000
  Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 20:55 -0700
    Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-27 04:01 +0000
      Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 22:43 -0700
        Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:24 +0000
        Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Bob Duncan <bob7duncan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 13:49 -0400
      Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-27 07:36 +0100

csiph-web