Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. |
| Date | 2021-09-26 22:43 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <sirllb$ad4$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <a776b2f1-1ae8-45a4-a0bb-eef68dd70b1bn@googlegroups.com> <sirfch$fvt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sirfnb$bj2$1@dont-email.me> |
On 9/26/2021 9:01 PM, Rich wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >> Also, you have a website! Nice. So, try to get your cipher up on >> your site. So, anybody can easily play with it? > > That won't happen. Because if he put it up on the website so people > could play with it, it would be broken within a day. Even if was broken within a half an hour, well, he could use this wonderful occurrence to learn exactly how they broke it. The code would be on the site for all to see. Then, he can start to learn some ways to make it stronger? Perhaps? I can see how he can get better and better by taking all of the breaks and details therein to make it harder and harder for the breakers to bust? Sound Kosher at all? A learning process. Who knows... After a nice learning process, his cipher might be getting better and better. Is this a damn pipe dream? Like a massive bong load, for all of the stoners out there? yikes! > By keeping it vaporware he can avoid the embarrassment of yet another > cipher broken in a day. Is it truly vaporware? I mean, he does have ADA code right? Well, how many tools exist that can convert certain ADA code into, say JavaScript? https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.ada/c/8RupAuYYiiA Is an ADA to JavaScript transpiler vaporware? Ohhh, shit. Damn.. I actually got emscripten to work from time to time.
Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 03:45 -0700
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-26 12:12 +0100
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 06:19 -0700
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-26 17:07 +0000
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. – Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-27 04:01 +0000
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-26 22:43 -0700
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:24 +0000
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Bob Duncan <bob7duncan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 13:49 -0400
Re: Unbreakable Cryptoghraphy. ? Many is the True Word Spoken in Jest. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-27 07:36 +0100
csiph-web