Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #81365

Re: rational numbers

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: rational numbers
Date 2021-09-21 09:39 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <sic28b$m8a$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <siagvq$a0c$1@dont-email.me> <siahjp$k2p$1@dont-email.me> <siaifp$8u1$1@dont-email.me> <sianpk$lq5$1@dont-email.me> <siarfn$ud5$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 20/09/2021 22:38, Bart wrote:
> On 20/09/2021 20:35, David Brown wrote:
>> On 20/09/2021 20:04, Bart wrote:
> 
>>> You're right: someone who's only implemented PRINT in various languages
>>> a few dozen times can't be expected to have an informed opinion about
>>> how well cout or printf tackles the job.
>>
>> Implementing it doesn't give you anything here except an inflated view
>> of your own opinion.  /Using/ print systems in various languages is
>> relevant.
> 
> Well, I've used print, of course, in 2-3 dozen languages I might have
> played with.
> 
> But to talk with some knowledge about how Print might be better
> implemented in any language, you really need to have tried implementing
> Print within a language, and specifically implementing it as a built-in
> feature

No one cares about how easy or hard it is to implement.  Seriously.
Rounded to the nearest 0.01% of programmers, /no one/ cares.  The
important thing is how people can /use/ the feature in the language, not
how it is implemented!

And how you want to /use/ your print features depends on the language
and what you want to do with it.  A BASIC-style print statement is fine
for BASIC-style languages - typically designed to be quick and simple
for easy tasks, but unsuitable for bigger work or more complex work, or
programs that don't fit into the simple sequence of start program, read
files and/or keyboard, print to screen and/or files, stop program.

But for a language that supports multiple types, formatting,
translations, redirected outputs, systems without a console, etc., then
a simple print statement won't do.  It is both too much, and too little.

In fact, /no/ single solution will do everything.  When you think you
have "/the/ answer" to a coding or programming language problem, you are
almost guaranteed to be wrong - and you, Bart, think you have all the
answers.

So a good, serious programming language does not provide a "print"
statement.  It does not even provide a "print" function as part of the
language itself.  It provides ways to make printing functionality.  Then
it can have one or more printing implementation as part of the standard
library, for the convenience of users - while letting them make their
own systems to suit more specialised needs, with their own balance of
pros and cons.

Thus C++ has printf that works reasonably for translations and
formatting, but not for different types, and it has std::cout that works
well for different types, but not for translations and formatting.  And
there is a new (C++20) formatting library that should work well for
translations, formatting /and/ different types, but is sure to have
other disadvantages (I haven't used it myself as yet).  And in my own
code I often use my own system because I have different needs from those
of most C++ programmers.

> 
>   But if you don't even know what "cout" is or how "<<" works
>> in C++, it is pointless to compare it to anything else.
> 
> It doesn't matter. I know what it is I'm trying to achieve: turn an
> expression into text and display it somewhere or send it somewhere.
> 
> So I'm judging how conveniently the language allows me to do that simple
> task. I don't care what else cout might do for me in that context.
> 
> Here, anyone can judge for themselves (although I doubt they'll be that
> open minded in a C++ group):
> 
>   20 print i, sqr(i)
> 
>   std::cout << i << " " << sqrt(i) << std::endl;
> 
> The first line is from decades-old BASIC. The second line, which also
> needs iostream and math.h includes, is from latest C++.
> 

The first version is easiest for a quick and dirty script.  The second
is better for more serious programming.  (I am not mocking quick and
dirty coding - that is suitable for a great deal of work, but it is
certainly not suitable for everything.)

Oh, and if your "sqr" is a language built-in function for square roots,
then that demonstrates another reason why serious languages avoid
built-in functions.  The name is wrong, and changing the library is
vastly easier than changing the language.

>> Any print system has its advantages and disadvantages.  You should be
>> able to understand that.  Instead, you'd rather assume that because it
>> is C++, it is necessarily all bad without any need for further thought
>> or knowledge.
> 
> As I said above, people can make up their own minds. Personally I find
> the first type considerably easier to write, and to read. The only
> difficulty is having to go and find out how to suppress the automatic
> space between items, and the newline at the end.
> 

And there you have it.

With your personal language and tools, if you want to change the way the
spacing or formatting works, you change the language and the
compiler/interpreter.  With real languages, the programmer changes the
code they write to change the formatting.

Contrary to some experts' views, I have nothing against BASIC.  I
learned to program in BASIC, in several dialects - the "B" stands for
"Beginners'".  But then I grew up, and understood that while languages
like BASIC can undoubtedly be good for a few hundred line programs, they
are rarely a good choice for more serious work.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-16 14:59 +0200
  Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-16 16:40 +0300
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-16 18:24 +0200
      Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-16 17:05 +0000
        Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-16 19:58 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 09:21 +0200
          Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 10:34 +0200
            Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 15:55 +0200
              Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 17:49 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 18:22 +0200
          Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:07 +1200
            Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 13:32 +0200
              Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:15 +1200
            Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 14:06 +0000
      Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-16 20:41 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-16 21:11 +0100
          Re: rational numbers Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-16 21:26 +0100
            Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-16 21:54 +0100
            Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 23:07 +0200
              Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 23:27 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-16 23:12 +0300
        Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 09:50 +0200
          Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 11:15 +0200
            Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 19:19 +0200
              Re: rational numbers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-17 19:00 -0400
              Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-18 11:39 +0200
                Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-18 11:56 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-18 11:01 +0100
  Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-17 05:36 +0000
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 09:55 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-17 11:16 +0000
        Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 18:33 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-10-06 13:06 -0700
    Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 14:03 +0000
      Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 17:12 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 17:16 +0200
          Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-17 18:59 +0200
            Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 17:13 +0000
              Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:17 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 14:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 15:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 21:53 +0000
      Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:34 +1200
        Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-18 12:00 +0200
          Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-18 14:54 +0000
            Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-18 17:36 +0100
              Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-18 23:29 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 01:09 +0100
                Re: rational numbers red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-09-18 23:45 -0700
              Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-18 22:48 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 00:46 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-19 08:06 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 10:26 +0100
              Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 12:04 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 16:01 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 17:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-20 05:25 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 10:37 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-22 04:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 11:26 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-22 23:13 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 13:45 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 21:37 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 15:29 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 07:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 21:54 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 00:31 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 08:33 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 16:11 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 18:08 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 18:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 19:49 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 19:04 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 21:35 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 21:38 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-21 10:28 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-21 09:08 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-21 09:39 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 11:12 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 15:45 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 14:37 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 17:09 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 16:26 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-21 18:04 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 11:51 -0700
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-22 11:09 +0200
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 15:38 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 15:36 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 16:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 09:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 17:45 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 17:02 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:16 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 11:53 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 20:48 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 20:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 23:29 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 13:47 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 20:11 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:33 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 20:43 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:59 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 21:20 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 20:32 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 20:24 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 18:52 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-21 18:34 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 01:16 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 00:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-22 23:45 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-22 23:51 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 18:42 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-23 21:52 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 00:17 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 02:03 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 11:18 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 10:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 12:21 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 12:40 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-23 08:05 -0400
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 15:02 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 08:48 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 23:05 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 23:47 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 16:56 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 01:58 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 19:35 -0700
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 09:07 -0700
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 09:21 -0700
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 14:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 17:02 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 16:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 18:31 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-24 09:12 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 12:10 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 11:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-24 15:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 17:25 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 09:27 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 11:07 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 10:14 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 11:53 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 11:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 12:34 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-25 15:37 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 15:46 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 15:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 17:16 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-27 23:51 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-27 23:41 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 10:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 14:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 17:47 +0200
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 17:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 17:08 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 19:30 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 10:06 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-22 05:06 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 10:51 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 10:54 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 11:59 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 11:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:17 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 14:32 +0100
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 16:23 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 15:18 +0300
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 16:16 +0200
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 15:15 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 17:57 +0200
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 16:05 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:13 -0700
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 09:01 +0000
                Re: rational numbers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-23 12:08 -0400
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 10:55 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 20:46 +0300
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:42 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-23 09:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-22 14:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 07:18 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 07:31 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-23 11:05 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 08:28 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 00:51 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-24 04:37 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 07:46 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 08:59 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 22:49 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 00:55 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 12:17 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:25 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 11:37 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-28 04:49 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 11:29 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-24 04:38 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 11:15 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 10:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:34 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 14:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 14:50 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-20 05:20 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 21:45 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-25 16:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:36 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 11:19 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-27 21:27 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 15:49 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-28 04:53 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-28 10:16 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-29 12:10 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 14:34 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 15:54 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-28 13:23 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 10:34 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 12:18 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:46 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 13:07 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-10-02 22:57 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-29 12:16 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 20:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-30 04:46 +0000
            Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-19 11:03 +1200
      Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:12 +0000
  Re: rational numbers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-23 07:38 -0700
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-24 09:45 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 07:50 +0000
      Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-24 10:58 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-24 02:48 -0700

csiph-web