Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #81347

Re: rational numbers

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: rational numbers
Date 2021-09-20 18:08 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <siablt$tjq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <si7msk$1vdt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <gkO1J.90181$rl3.18099@fx45.iad> <si8h8v$pt0$1@dont-email.me> <si9a0a$vgn$1@dont-email.me> <sia8ap$qft$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 20/09/2021 17:11, Bart wrote:
> On 20/09/2021 07:33, David Brown wrote:
>> On 20/09/2021 01:31, Bart wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 22:54, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>>> Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes:
>>>>> Bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, because it is so peculiar. I wouldn't know how to create such a
>>>>>> function, but it would have been a better way of presenting a print
>>>>>> feature, and more conventional.
>>>>>
>>>>> The basic idea with overloading a binary operator, rather than using a
>>>>> function call syntax, is that the output can be expanded with your own
>>>>> custom types (which is not really possible if it used a function call
>>>>> syntax).
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, you can achieve this:
>>>>>
>>>>>    MyClass obj;
>>>>>    std::cout << "Value = " << obj << "\n";
>>>>
>>>>     fprintf(stdout, "Value = %s\n" obj.to_string());
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know how well C++ can match even a simple scripting language in
>>> capabilities. But there, you could do something like this:
>>>
>>>    x := (obj1, obj2, obj3)       # list of 3 objects
>>>
>>> All objects could be of different types, with their own to-string
>>> methods. But even if all of the same type, you'd need this:
>>>
>>>    print x
>>>
>>> to apply those custom to-string methods to the elements of x without
>>> being told. Include x itself if that had its own to-string routine.
>>>
>>
>> There should be no problem making a variadic template function "print"
>> that turns "print(a, b, c);" into "cout << a << b << c;", if someone
>> really dislikes the << syntax.  It could also turn it into "cout <<
>> a.to_string() << ' ' << b.to_string() << ' ' << c.to_string();", or
>> whatever is the day's preference.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> My guess is cout and << (don't ask me to explain the difference, except
> one needs to go at the start!) are already implemented on top of a stack
> of language-defining features.

If you want to learn C++, learn C++.  Please stop giving opinions on
everything you hate about it, or all the limitations and problems you
think it has, when you know so very little about the language.

> 
> Now you're saying that we need more templates on top of that to make the
> syntax palatable.

No.  I am saying that /if/ you really want to have the syntax "print(a,
b, c)", or /if/ you really want to have printing based on "to_string()"
methods, then you can do so.

The std::cout and iostream system has its limitations - we are all aware
of that.  The C++ standards committee is aware of that, and there is a
new system in the works that is more modern.  I'm sure plenty of people
will find things they like about the new system, and plenty will find
things they don't like - that is the nature of /every/ programming
language except perhaps ones written by a single person, and used by
that same single person.

> 
> It's not surprising that people complain about C++ being slower to compile!
> 
> My view is that basic Print is a fundamental feature that needs to be
> natively supported by the core language. Then it can be kept streamlined
> without wasting too much compiler time on it.

That's your view.  It is not unique to you, but it is not the view of
many other people.

<snip pointless repetition of how well your our personal language suits
your own personal preferences>

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-16 14:59 +0200
  Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-16 16:40 +0300
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-16 18:24 +0200
      Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-16 17:05 +0000
        Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-16 19:58 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 09:21 +0200
          Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 10:34 +0200
            Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 15:55 +0200
              Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 17:49 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 18:22 +0200
          Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:07 +1200
            Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 13:32 +0200
              Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:15 +1200
            Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 14:06 +0000
      Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-16 20:41 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-16 21:11 +0100
          Re: rational numbers Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-16 21:26 +0100
            Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-16 21:54 +0100
            Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 23:07 +0200
              Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 23:27 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-16 23:12 +0300
        Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 09:50 +0200
          Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 11:15 +0200
            Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 19:19 +0200
              Re: rational numbers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-17 19:00 -0400
              Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-18 11:39 +0200
                Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-18 11:56 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-18 11:01 +0100
  Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-17 05:36 +0000
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 09:55 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-17 11:16 +0000
        Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 18:33 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-10-06 13:06 -0700
    Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 14:03 +0000
      Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 17:12 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 17:16 +0200
          Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-17 18:59 +0200
            Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 17:13 +0000
              Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:17 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 14:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 15:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 21:53 +0000
      Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:34 +1200
        Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-18 12:00 +0200
          Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-18 14:54 +0000
            Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-18 17:36 +0100
              Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-18 23:29 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 01:09 +0100
                Re: rational numbers red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-09-18 23:45 -0700
              Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-18 22:48 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 00:46 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-19 08:06 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 10:26 +0100
              Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 12:04 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 16:01 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 17:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-20 05:25 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 10:37 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-22 04:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 11:26 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-22 23:13 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 13:45 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 21:37 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 15:29 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 07:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 21:54 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 00:31 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 08:33 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 16:11 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 18:08 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 18:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 19:49 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 19:04 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 21:35 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 21:38 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-21 10:28 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-21 09:08 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-21 09:39 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 11:12 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 15:45 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 14:37 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 17:09 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 16:26 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-21 18:04 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 11:51 -0700
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-22 11:09 +0200
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 15:38 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 15:36 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 16:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 09:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 17:45 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 17:02 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:16 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 11:53 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 20:48 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 20:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 23:29 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 13:47 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 20:11 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:33 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 20:43 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:59 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 21:20 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 20:32 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 20:24 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 18:52 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-21 18:34 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 01:16 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 00:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-22 23:45 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-22 23:51 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 18:42 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-23 21:52 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 00:17 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 02:03 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 11:18 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 10:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 12:21 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 12:40 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-23 08:05 -0400
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 15:02 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 08:48 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 23:05 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 23:47 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 16:56 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 01:58 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 19:35 -0700
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 09:07 -0700
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 09:21 -0700
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 14:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 17:02 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 16:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 18:31 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-24 09:12 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 12:10 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 11:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-24 15:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 17:25 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 09:27 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 11:07 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 10:14 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 11:53 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 11:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 12:34 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-25 15:37 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 15:46 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 15:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 17:16 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-27 23:51 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-27 23:41 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 10:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 14:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 17:47 +0200
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 17:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 17:08 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 19:30 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 10:06 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-22 05:06 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 10:51 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 10:54 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 11:59 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 11:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:17 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 14:32 +0100
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 16:23 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 15:18 +0300
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 16:16 +0200
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 15:15 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 17:57 +0200
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 16:05 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:13 -0700
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 09:01 +0000
                Re: rational numbers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-23 12:08 -0400
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 10:55 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 20:46 +0300
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:42 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-23 09:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-22 14:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 07:18 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 07:31 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-23 11:05 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 08:28 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 00:51 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-24 04:37 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 07:46 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 08:59 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 22:49 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 00:55 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 12:17 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:25 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 11:37 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-28 04:49 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 11:29 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-24 04:38 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 11:15 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 10:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:34 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 14:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 14:50 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-20 05:20 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 21:45 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-25 16:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:36 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 11:19 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-27 21:27 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 15:49 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-28 04:53 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-28 10:16 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-29 12:10 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 14:34 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 15:54 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-28 13:23 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 10:34 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 12:18 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:46 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 13:07 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-10-02 22:57 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-29 12:16 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 20:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-30 04:46 +0000
            Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-19 11:03 +1200
      Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:12 +0000
  Re: rational numbers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-23 07:38 -0700
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-24 09:45 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 07:50 +0000
      Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-24 10:58 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-24 02:48 -0700

csiph-web