Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #162766

Re: Decimal Floating Point

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Decimal Floating Point
Date 2021-09-20 00:16 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <si91vc$bm4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <N3L_I.34042$tG6.4937@fx39.iad> <shfvpl$vu6$1@dont-email.me> <v%N_I.46385$Dr.13473@fx40.iad> <shh7fj$s4s$1@dont-email.me> <si574v$1icd$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/18/21 1:20 PM, Manfred wrote:
> On 9/11/2021 5:23 AM, James Kuyper wrote:
...
>> That doesn't change anything - you'll get better responses to a question
>> about GnuC in a forum specific to GnuC, and you'll get better answers to
>> a question about Visual C in a forum devoted to Visual C, you'll get
>> better answers to questions about tcc are in a forum devoted to tcc,
>> etc. The only questions where this is the best place to get an answer
>> are questions that are not specific to any particular compiler - which
>> is pretty much the same as standard C.
...
> You keep saying "you'll get better answers...", now while this obviously 
> depends on topicality (although I don't agree entirely with your 
> definition of this newsgroup), it also depends on the activity of the 
> posters involved.
> Considering that most of the Usenet is dead thanks to spammers, trolls, 
> and, last in order, migration to other platforms, while this newsgroup 
> is still somewhat active, this gives a better chance to get a good 
> answer here, where there is a fair number of competent people, rather 
> than from a group that might be more specific, but just inactive.

I was very careful to say "forum", not "usenet newsgroup". If there is
any particular compiler or operating system for which comp.lang.c is the
best available forum for discussing it, then it is almost completely
dead - if it were still alive, there would be a currently active forum
somewhere that would be a better place than here to get answers about it.
Now, that allows for the possibility that there might be some zombie
systems for which that is actually true - but neither Visual C++, GnuC,
Windows, nor POSIX are zombies. I'm not so sure about tcc.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 06:35 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 08:17 -0700
    Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 15:44 +0000
      Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:06 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-10 18:09 +0200
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2021-09-10 16:23 +0000
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:37 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:38 -0700
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:58 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-09-10 18:11 +0000
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 12:13 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 14:52 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-09-11 07:09 -0700
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 23:23 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 19:04 +0000
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 23:23 -0400
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-18 19:20 +0200
              Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-20 00:16 -0400
    Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:14 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 23:50 +0100
        Re: Decimal Floating Point David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-11 20:22 +0200
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 15:37 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 12:58 +0200
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 17:36 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 18:04 +0200
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 18:06 +0200
    Re: Decimal Floating Point Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:37 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 20:43 +0200
    Re: Decimal Floating Point "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 09:52 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 10:08 -0700
        Re: Decimal Floating Point antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-09-11 00:36 +0000
    Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 19:07 +0000
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 06:31 +0200
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-10 23:29 -0700
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 16:31 +0200
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-09-11 10:04 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-11 15:08 -0400
              Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 15:39 -0700
                Re: Decimal Floating Point Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-11 19:28 -0400
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:21 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-09-10 23:29 +0200
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Kaz Kylheku <563-365-8930@kylheku.com> - 2021-09-11 16:59 +0000
    Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 16:05 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Kaz Kylheku <563-365-8930@kylheku.com> - 2021-09-14 16:25 +0000
  Re: Decimal Floating Point "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 13:08 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2021-09-13 22:23 -0400

csiph-web