Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #162766
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Decimal Floating Point |
| Date | 2021-09-20 00:16 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <si91vc$bm4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <N3L_I.34042$tG6.4937@fx39.iad> <shfvpl$vu6$1@dont-email.me> <v%N_I.46385$Dr.13473@fx40.iad> <shh7fj$s4s$1@dont-email.me> <si574v$1icd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
On 9/18/21 1:20 PM, Manfred wrote: > On 9/11/2021 5:23 AM, James Kuyper wrote: ... >> That doesn't change anything - you'll get better responses to a question >> about GnuC in a forum specific to GnuC, and you'll get better answers to >> a question about Visual C in a forum devoted to Visual C, you'll get >> better answers to questions about tcc are in a forum devoted to tcc, >> etc. The only questions where this is the best place to get an answer >> are questions that are not specific to any particular compiler - which >> is pretty much the same as standard C. ... > You keep saying "you'll get better answers...", now while this obviously > depends on topicality (although I don't agree entirely with your > definition of this newsgroup), it also depends on the activity of the > posters involved. > Considering that most of the Usenet is dead thanks to spammers, trolls, > and, last in order, migration to other platforms, while this newsgroup > is still somewhat active, this gives a better chance to get a good > answer here, where there is a fair number of competent people, rather > than from a group that might be more specific, but just inactive. I was very careful to say "forum", not "usenet newsgroup". If there is any particular compiler or operating system for which comp.lang.c is the best available forum for discussing it, then it is almost completely dead - if it were still alive, there would be a currently active forum somewhere that would be a better place than here to get answers about it. Now, that allows for the possibility that there might be some zombie systems for which that is actually true - but neither Visual C++, GnuC, Windows, nor POSIX are zombies. I'm not so sure about tcc.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 06:35 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 08:17 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 15:44 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:06 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-10 18:09 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2021-09-10 16:23 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:37 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:38 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:58 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-09-10 18:11 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 12:13 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 14:52 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-09-11 07:09 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 23:23 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 19:04 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 23:23 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-18 19:20 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-20 00:16 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:14 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 23:50 +0100
Re: Decimal Floating Point David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-11 20:22 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 15:37 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 12:58 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 17:36 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 18:04 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 18:06 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:37 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 20:43 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 09:52 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 10:08 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-09-11 00:36 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 19:07 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 06:31 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-10 23:29 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 16:31 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-09-11 10:04 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-11 15:08 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 15:39 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-11 19:28 -0400
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:21 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-09-10 23:29 +0200
Re: Decimal Floating Point Kaz Kylheku <563-365-8930@kylheku.com> - 2021-09-11 16:59 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 16:05 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Kaz Kylheku <563-365-8930@kylheku.com> - 2021-09-14 16:25 +0000
Re: Decimal Floating Point "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 13:08 -0700
Re: Decimal Floating Point Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2021-09-13 22:23 -0400
csiph-web